Computation and Language
☆ AutoScaffold: AI-Guided Scaffolding for Reinforcement Learning of Language Models
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) produces rich training experience, yet outcome rewards reduce each attempt to a single number and leave most of this information unused. Training-time scaffolds, such as strategies or hints added to the prompt during training, offer a natural way to turn this information into guidance, but their design and adaptation are largely left to humans and tailored to specific domains. We introduce AutoScaffold, a unified AI-for-AI framework that turns a student's training experience into adaptive scaffolds, with minimal domain-specific information and no human intervention during training. A frozen teacher periodically examines this experience, diagnoses bottlenecks, and designs scaffolds in two forms: (i) strategies shared across a class of tasks and (ii) hints for individual hard tasks, adjusting the content and amount of support as the student learns. The scaffolds are removed at evaluation. We apply the same framework to ALFWorld, search-based QA, mathematical reasoning, and GPU kernel generation. When evaluated without scaffolds, students trained with AutoScaffold outperform those trained with the corresponding RL baselines in all four domains, with gains of 7.2 points in ALFWorld success and 4.0 points in average QA exact match. On GPU kernel generation, AutoScaffold increases the fraction of tasks with a correct kernel that runs faster than the PyTorch reference by up to 5.0 points. On math, our student surpasses QuestA's reported accuracy using approximately one-third as many student training steps. Analyses show that the teacher identifies a different failure in each task class and shifts its scaffolds from step-by-step workflows to targeted fixes as the student improves, and that its revised scaffolds help the student learn more than keeping the previous scaffold or using no scaffold.
☆ Contrastive Discovery: Open-Ended Scientific Discovery over Competing Explanations NeurIPS 2026
LLM agents are increasingly used for open-ended, data-driven scientific discovery, yet most of them evaluate hypotheses pointwise, testing an empirical claim $h$ only against its complement $\neg h$. When evidence rejects $h$, the agent learns that one explanation is unlikely but not which alternative the evidence supports. To recover that alternative, we introduce Contrastive Discovery, which replaces the single hypothesis with a contrast set, a scientific question paired with mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive competing explanations. Each experiment is scored by how its evidence redistributes belief across the set, and the question is resolved when belief concentrates on one explanation. Because contrast sets change only the unit an agent proposes and scores, an existing agent can use them to re-evaluate evidence it has already collected or to guide its search. Across six domains, $89\%$ of the pointwise candidates with the largest belief shifts are rejections. On the same evidence, contrast sets resolve $73\%$ of these candidates to a specific alternative. When contrast sets guide search, the agent resolves $67\%$ more questions than pointwise surprisal under the same experiment budget. In a blinded study, $38$ human experts chose the same explanation on $78\%$ of resolved questions and on $82\%$ of questions where the pointwise agent rejected its hypothesis and stopped. Together, these results support explicit competing explanations as a way for discovery agents to resolve more scientific questions from the same evidence and validation budget.
comment: Accepted at NeurIPS 2026. 55 pages. Project page: https://codiscovery.ai/contrastive-discovery/
☆ Comparative Analysis of Agent Evaluation Frameworks: Stability, Detection, and Discovery in Enterprise Analytics Agents KDD 2026
Deploying LLM-based analytics agents in enterprise settings requires evaluation frameworks that can reliably detect failures across complex, multi-tool workflows. We present a three-phase comparative study of three evaluation frameworks, each representing a distinct evaluation paradigm (trace-based LLM judging, text-only LLM judging with red-teaming, and deterministic heuristics), applied to two analytics agents in a controlled research setting using frozen execution traces. Phase 1 quantifies evaluation harness stability through repeated measurements, finding that 97% of configurations meet the stability threshold and that stability patterns are agent-independent. Phase 2 measures known risk detection on 72 ground-truth test cases, where the trace-based framework achieves the best precision-recall balance (F1=0.90) while text-only evaluation matches on recall but generates 5x more false alarms. Phase 3 evaluates unknown risk discovery, uncovering 24 novel failures with zero overlap between functional testing and security red-teaming. Our results demonstrate that (1) the information available to the evaluation harness determines evaluation quality, (2) functional and security evaluation are complementary, and (3) LLM-based evaluation harnesses surface subtle errors that human reviewers miss. We recommend a two-framework strategy: trace-based evaluation for functional assessment and adversarial red-teaming for security validation.
comment: Accepted to KDD 2026, Jeju, Korea. 9 pages, 3 figures
☆ Mechanistic Interpretability Needs a Logic of Inference NeurIPS 2026
Neural networks are increasingly studied not merely as predictive systems, but as complex systems whose internal computations are themselves objects of scientific inquiry. Recent progress in mechanistic interpretability (MI) has made it possible to identify neurons, features, circuits, population structures, and dynamical patterns associated with model behavior. As these tools improve, attention is shifting from what can be observed inside a model to how those observations support mechanistic explanations. We examine the parallel efforts of neuroscience and MI to address this question and identify recurring inferential bottlenecks when inferring mechanisms from complex neural systems. We propose five principles and organize them into a recursive logic for a more rigorous procedure of mechanistic inference. These principles provide a framework that supports scientific discovery in two senses: it helps turn local interpretability findings into cumulative knowledge of mechanisms within models, and it makes those mechanisms sufficiently precise to generate testable hypotheses about domains beyond the models. Evidence beyond MI is ultimately required to establish what model mechanisms reveal about the world.
comment: NeurIPS 2026 Interp4Discovery (Oral)
☆ Pterodactyl: Pushing the Limits of Efficient Automated Translation Evaluation
In this paper, we present 1020 Group's submission to the WMT26 shared task on automated quality evaluation. Our system, Pterodactyl, was engineered specifically for subtasks 2 and 3, that is, segment-level quality score prediction and the detection of error-free segments. Pterodactyl is a highly customizable, ultra-low cost system optimized for binary classification in translation triage and data curation. It is based on an LLM-as-a-judge approach, with prompt engineering and model selection guided by ROC analysis. We also developed several variants of Pterodactyl that were specifically adapted for subtasks 3.
comment: 6 pages, 4 figures
☆ FERN: Cross-Benchmark Table Retrieval for Text-to-SQL with Frozen Retrievers and Learned Ranking
Text-to-SQL systems over large pooled catalogs must first retrieve the tables a question needs. We compare against the published table recall of RASL, which uses Claude 3.5 models to extract keywords and select tables, on pooled BIRD, Spider, and Fiben catalogs. FERN (Feature-Engineered Ranking with No generative LLM) instead fuses three frozen retrievers into 100 candidates, describes each with up to 120 features, and reorders them with LightGBM rankers fitted once on BIRD's training questions. On Spider, where it was not fitted, its candidate pool alone reaches RASL's published recall at fifteen tables (98.0), and the ranker raises the share of questions with every gold table in the top five (complete@5) from 83.9% to 95.6%. At five tables, FERN's recall is within one point of RASL's on Spider (96.7 vs 97.0) and on BIRD with its evidence hints (96.6 vs 97.5), and 8.2 points below on BIRD without them (89.3). On 121 real BEAVER questions, without BEAVER fitting, its recall at fifteen (82.1) falls between two BEAVER-trained retrievers (80.8, 84.5), but its complete@15 is below both (49.6 vs 54.5 and 62.0). On Fiben, it falls far short at fifteen tables (54.2 vs 69.2, different question sets), although its recall at fifty is numerically close to RASL's question-only retrieval result (80.7 vs 79.4). On BIRD dev with evidence, non-retrieval features raise complete@5 by 7.7 points over retrieval signals alone. On BIRD dev, median latency is 208 ms per question on one A100, without hosted model calls.
comment: 19 pages
☆ When does text encoding matter for language modeling?
UTF-8's role as the de facto encoding standard in language models introduces cross-lingual inequities due to its variable-length design. However, the effect that this encoding choice has on model performance remains largely unexamined. In this work, we investigate how text encoding impacts the performance of byte-level language models, comparing UTF-8 with a wide range of other encoding strategies, including other Unicode-based approaches, language-specific encodings, and our own customized encodings. To facilitate our analysis, we propose Aether: a hybrid encoding scheme that uses script-specific encodings for our target setting while maintaining full Unicode coverage through UTF-8 fallbacks, using this framework to model four orthographically diverse languages. Surprisingly, we find that while languages with information-dense characters (Chinese, Korean) significantly benefit from compressive encodings, languages whose characters carry less information individually (Georgian, Tamil) are largely insensitive to encoding choice. In light of these findings, we argue that text encoding should be a language-specific design decision, rather than a universal default.
☆ Earlybird: Predictive Streaming Speech Recognition in 29M Parameters
Streaming speech recognizers output a word only after the speaker has finished it, typically 90-400 ms later. For a voice agent every millisecond counts: the sooner the words are outputted, the sooner the agent can start a search or plan its reply. We present Earlybird, a 29M-parameter streaming recognizer (16.8 MB at 4 bits). Earlybird learns from audio cut off at random points, including partway through a word, and is asked to predict every word that is due by then in full, plus a guess of the next two words. Its raw token probabilities give a confidence for every word including the one still being spoken. On clean audiobook speech (LibriSpeech test-clean), the median word is predicted correctly 90 ms before the speaker finishes it, while released streaming models get it 90 to 400 ms after it ends. Earlybird is the earliest on all six test sets we time, covering audiobooks, TED talks, public speech, earnings calls, and synthetic speech. On the same audiobooks, 69% of words are predicted correctly before they end, against 3-25% for the other models. For words still being spoken, confidence is calibrated, with an expected calibration error (ECE) of 3.7 to 5.5. On the eight English Open ASR Leaderboard sets, it is more accurate than Moonshine Tiny on every set and roughly ties Whistle, a model of the same size.
comment: 9 pages, 3 figures, 6 tables. Model: https://huggingface.co/sahilmahendrakar/Earlybird-29M
☆ Bits or permutations? Spending a fixed inference budget on weight precision or on option-order averaging in small local language models
Local language models can save memory by storing weights in fewer bits, and they can reduce sensitivity to the order of answer options by averaging a few reorderings. We ask whether the first makes the second worse, and which is the cheaper way to spend a fixed budget. On Qwen3-0.6B and Qwen3-1.7B with simulated round-to-nearest weight quantization (8, 6, 4 and 3 bits, fp16 reference), read from the logits of the letters A to D on ARC-Easy, ARC-Challenge, MMLU and HellaSwag (300 items each), 6 bits lose no accuracy against fp16 (they score +1.8 (+1.0 to +2.5) and +0.9 (+0.3 to +1.5) points higher, which we do not explain), and 8 bits change it by -0.7 (-1.1 to -0.3) and -0.4 (-0.7 to -0.2) points. At 4 bits the answer-slot skew rises from 0.15 to 0.53 (0.6B) and from 0.07 to 0.12 (1.7B); Gaussian noise at the same weight SNR gives 0.15 and 0.37 (two draws) and 0.19 (one draw), so the control is inconclusive on whether rounding adds slot skew beyond equal-power noise. Flip rates rise but stay below an accuracy-matched baseline of independent uniform errors. Averaging four cyclic orders recovers +12.6 points at 4 bits for 0.6B (+5.3 at fp16). We price bits and passes in one machine-independent unit, weight bytes read times passes. In cost-matched pairs, extra orders beat extra bits only when the weights have 6 or more bits, and the decision table reduces to: use 6-bit weights and spend the rest of the budget on up to four orders, one pass each. Everything is simulated on two small models with the simplest quantizer; a title-level search found no earlier study of quantization together with option order.
comment: 25 pages, 15 figures, 9 tables
☆ REAL Loss: Optimizing Real Expected Acceptance Length for Speculative Decoding
Speculative decoding accelerates LLM inference by having a draft model propose multiple tokens for the target model to verify in one pass. The speedup is governed by the expected acceptance length (EAL), yet standard training objectives such as cross-entropy, KL divergence, and total variation focus only on distribution matching or single-step overlap. Recent studies instead propose block-level training objectives, aiming to optimize EAL directly. However, these objectives remain surrogates rather than exact formulations of EAL. For example, some average later acceptance over target-distributed continuations rather than the verification branches selected by accepted tokens, introducing a covariance gap that can reverse the gradient direction. We analyze this gap and derive REAL, a real EAL training loss that uses path weights for unbiased estimation and Rao-Blackwellization for variance reduction. In a controlled loss-level comparison with a Qwen3.6-35B-A3B target and a Domino drafter, REAL outperforms WTV, VSD, DBLast, and the static LK baseline on probabilistic serving acceptance length across 9 task subsets and 5 evaluation seeds. These gains require only a change to the training loss, with no modification to the drafter architecture or inference procedure, demonstrating the practicality of real EAL training. A reference implementation of the REAL loss is available at https://github.com/King-ty/speculators/tree/real-loss.
comment: 19 pages, 10 figures
☆ Blurring the Block Boundaries: Overlapping Block Denoising for Efficient Diffusion Language Models
Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) have emerged as effective alternatives to autoregressive models for latency-critical tasks, enabling faster token generation. Recent advances employ block diffusion with self-editing capabilities, where each block refines tokens iteratively before advancing to the next one. Yet each block is only as fast as its slowest token, and the next block cannot start before it. We suggest Blurring the Block Boundaries (B3), a novel method with which two blocks are refined in parallel within a shared forward pass. B3 calibrates itself on the fly, opening the next block only once the model is ready to start generating it. It is a training-free and hyperparameter-free acceleration method which seamlessly integrates within any self-editing block diffusion model. Evaluated on state-of-the-art DLMs across 10 diverse datasets spanning varied tasks and difficulty levels, B3 results in on par generation quality and 11.5-14.5% speedup compared to the base model, pushing the Pareto frontier for latency-quality trade-offs in DLM inference.
★ ARE-bench: Benchmarking Agents' Research Ability in Real-World Researcher Sessions and Workspaces
Jiahang Lin, Wanying Ren, Wanghan Xu, Huayu Sha, Yang Shu, Zhonghang Lu, Chengjun Pan, Yi Dong, Shichun Liu, Yuyang Hu, Shihan Dou, Honglin Guo, Huijie Lv, Pujun Zheng, Zhe Sun, Yuankai Ying, Yiding Wang, Jiahao Chen, Zhixiong Yang, Dingbo Yuan, Yicheng Zou, Zhecan Wang, Guoxiu He, Xiaoyu Xing, Qi Zhang, Tao Gui, Xuanjing Huang
Research agents achieve increasingly strong benchmark scores, yet these scores do not necessarily translate into reliable delivery in ongoing research projects. Many research-agent benchmarks emphasize standalone tasks and relatively self-contained workflows in clean or curated workspaces. However, researchers ask agents to complete one step within an ongoing project, where requests depend on earlier session decisions and workspaces contain unfinished files, outdated versions, and failed attempts. We introduce ARE-bench to evaluate whether research agents advance ongoing projects while respecting prior decisions and existing workspace state, grounded in real session context and in-progress workspaces. ARE-bench includes 75 tasks built on agent sessions and full workspaces from recruited researchers' own projects, spanning seven research stages, 33 requirements, and 150 sub-requirements, with 1,173 binary checklist items in total. Each task is anchored at a real user request, preserves its requirements, and summarizes the earlier requests still in effect as background. The complete workspace is replayed to that boundary without cleanup, preserving artifacts from earlier turns. Each checklist is compiled from an intent-aligned rubric and credits any valid solution. Across seven frontier models, the strongest passes every checklist item on only 66.2% of tasks, and Design and Execution rank among the hardest stages for every model. Three models pass about 69% of tasks when only delivery contracts and general norms are checked, but just 28.4% to 40.0% once historical and material or workspace requirements are also checked. Evaluating delivery without these contextual requirements can therefore overestimate research agents and mask differences between them.
☆ EngineAgent: Agentizing On-Device LLM Inference Engines with Inference Stack Hierarchy Awareness and Hardware Abilities
Zhengxiang Huang, Yujie Sun, Shengheng Chen, Zhaode Wang, Chaoyue Niu, Zeyu Zhao, Chengfei Lv, Fan Wu, Guihai Chen
Rapidly evolving LLM architectures and heterogeneous mobile hardware make supporting new models in on-device inference engines a recurring and costly system challenge. Each model may require coordinated changes across conversion, graph construction, operators, and hardware backends. Existing coding agents often miss these cross-layer dependencies and struggle to diagnose failures across host--device execution paths. We present EngineAgent, an agentic system for automating on-device LLM model enablement. Its key insight is to separate reusable engine and hardware knowledge from model-specific implementation. Before enablement, EngineAgent constructs a hierarchy-aware engine index that captures engine abstraction layers and cross-layer dependencies, and pre-validates backend-specific build, execution, and debugging workflows using already supported models. For each new model, a builder uses this knowledge to coordinate cross-layer changes, while an auditor checks implementation completeness and drives iterative debugging through device-side validation. Across 12 tasks spanning three mobile LLMs and four engine--backend pairs on CPUs, GPUs, and NPUs, EngineAgent achieves 75% end-to-end success with either of two underlying LLMs, versus 33.3% for the strongest coding-agent baseline. Success requires compilation, on-device execution, and output-logit agreement with reference implementations. EngineAgent also reduces average per-task time and model-API cost relative to baselines using the same underlying LLMs.
☆ AI Isn't Getting Dumber, We're Getting Pickier: Rising Standards in Human Evaluation of Large Language Models
Users often complain that AI assistants such as ChatGPT are getting worse. Some versions do change, but human evaluation leaves a second possibility untested: the people judging may change. We separate the two on Chatbot Arena, a public platform where people compare answers from two anonymous large language models (LLMs) and pick the better one or say both are bad. We study 1,260,967 blind votes cast from May 2023 to August 2024 on pairs of models whose versions are fixed: dated vendor snapshots and models with fixed open weights. For the same pair of unchanged models, the share of votes saying "both are bad" rises by 1.71 percentage points a month on a mean of 17.1%, and by 1.91 points a month in 2024. In fourteen pairs observed often in both 2023 and 2024, it rose in every one, from 15.5% to 23.3%. The ranking does not trend: in 2024, the stronger model's share of decisive votes is flat. The rise holds within the same voter and on the same pair, and across arrival cohorts from their first recorded vote. It holds with prompt controls, in every major language, for dated vendor snapshots, open-weight models and models with stable answer length, and between interface changes. The drift is shared across models: month effects estimated from other models' pairs remove it from each model's own pairs. Platform-wide, the average model would be expected to score 78% against the 2023 average, yet the share of "both are bad" votes ended near where it began. The pattern fits a standard that follows the category's progress, so a product that stands still is judged as declining. Absolute verdicts on AI drifted while relative comparisons held steady, an evaluation drift that matters for LLM leaderboards and for the human feedback used to train models.
comment: 23 pages, 6 figures, 10 tables; working paper
☆ Point-in-Time Encoders for Earnings Calls
Text encoders turn earnings calls into vectors for search, for language models that answer from retrieved passages, and for forecasting models. A live retriever can use an encoder trained once on all available text, as finance retrievers are, but a backtest needs an encoder that read no text written after the date of each vector. To address this look-ahead bias, from 412,248 calls we train vintages under four pretraining recipes, with yearly cutoffs from 2010 to 2024, and each vintage reads only text dated on or before its cutoff. We then fine-tune each vintage on the question-answer pairs of the calls themselves. The vintages we train on calls alone, with 33.8M parameters, retrieve answers on held-out calls better than the general retrievers we tested in every test quarter. Their vectors also raise by about half the rank correlation between next-day returns and forecasts built from past returns and firm size. When each vintage continues the previous one, a later vintage retrieves better on earlier quarters than the vintage available at the time, and a point-in-time language model that answers from the passages the later vintage retrieves inherits the gain. The 2024 vintage of our families also forecasts earnings surprises better, although the interval of this gain includes zero on calls that no vintage read. It forecasts returns no better, so point-in-time vintages matter most for retrieval and little for forecasts of returns.
comment: 10 pages, 3 figures, 7 tables. Accepted at the 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Large Language Models for Finance, IEEE BigData 2026. Code: https://github.com/Alessiobrini/point-in-time-encoders-for-earnings-calls
☆ MMDM: Measuring Massive Multitask Decision Making
System-1 Decision Models directly make structured probabilistic decisions over query-specified options given a state in a single forward pass, without autoregressively generating reasoning trajectories or textual responses. Recent evaluations cover diverse tasks but often rely on existing benchmarks, where prior exposure to test material can obscure generalization. Moreover, real-world decision making often involves long contexts, large option spaces, and complex logical dependencies, challenges that existing benchmarks do not adequately capture together. Thus, we introduce MMDM (Massive Multitask Decision Making), a benchmark of 5,448 high-quality questions across 16 task categories, combining newly constructed tasks with source-grounded recompositions and rewrites for single-select, multi-select, and soft-label decision making in fresh contexts. It covers realistic scenarios such as agent state tracking, tool and skill selection, preference judgments, and rubric scoring, with option spaces ranging from 2 to 1,024 and inputs extending to 64,817 tokens. With MMDM, we conduct a comprehensive quantitative evaluation of 28 decision models, showing that many perform well on common knowledge yet struggle with interdependent options, constrained decisions, and multi-select tasks. For example, Perplexity Decider-V1.2 reaches 78.75% Hard Single-select Accuracy on world knowledge, but only 53.95% on option logic and 47.95% on constraint planning, while the best Hard Multi-select Accuracy across all models is 36.81%. These results highlight joint reasoning, constraint-aware selection, and complete multi-select recovery as key priorities for decision model development, with MMDM providing a testbed for measuring this progress.
comment: Project page: https://mmdm-benchmark.github.io/
☆ Semantic Chains: From Reachable Facts to Justified Answers
How can the facts that justify an answer be found from a question and presented as a sequence of connected statements? This paper models a context as a graph of logical facts and takes as given which expressions represent each fact. A parent fact can express a relation among its subfacts, and a preserving edge allows the content of a subfact to be recovered within a full representation of its parent. Suppose a root fact justifies the full answer and a path of preserving edges leads from that root to a fact that designates an object shared by the question and the answer. Under the conditions of the model, a search starting from the objects in the question reaches the root and covers every fact in the selected expansion. The root then admits a text that forms a single link connecting the question to the full answer and justifying it. For chains with several links, the paper gives a complete enumeration of candidate orders within the stated class and specifies when the link texts jointly preserve the justification and support every transition.
comment: 31 pages, 10 figures
☆ An AI Assistant for Automating Anti-Corruption Expertise of Draft Legislation Based on the TRACE Framework
We present an AI assistant for automating anti-corruption expertise of draft legislation based on the TRACE architecture, designed to screen bills for corruption risks: pinpoint provisions an expert would criticise and name the regulatory defect in each. The pipeline combines a deterministic parsing core, model-guided single-provision qualification, rule-based factor assignment, and external human oversight. To evaluate the assistant, we constructed an open benchmark from the published conclusions of Ukraine's National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NAZK), comprising 132 draft laws with 474 model-extracted findings. A system flag agrees with a finding when it targets a compatible provision and an LLM judge rates the risk as the same (strict) or partly the same (lenient). On 100 draft laws, the pipeline matches 0.28 of the findings within its top ten flags using the local Gemma 4 31B model, 0.30 with Sonnet 5.5, and 0.43-0.46 across all flags (non-blind; the frozen blind baseline achieves 0.21, 95% CI 0.16-0.26). Across all runs, most misses occur on provisions that the system located but qualified as a different risk, and none of the 32 legal-collision findings was matched. On 21 acts held out from tuning, the pipeline outperforms a monolithic prompt containing the full methodology under the strict measure, though not under the lenient one, and Opus 5.5 adds nothing over Sonnet. The reported scores reflect agreement with model-extracted findings rated by an LLM judge whose two access routes agree on 73 of 74 labels, without human expert validation.
comment: 18 pages, 3 figures, 8 tables
☆ Dyship: Leveraging Acoustic Features For Speaker Relationship Classification From Dyadic Conversations
We introduce DyShip, a framework for classifying speaker familiarity and kinship from dyadic conversations in the Seamless Interaction corpus. We compare five speech representations: spectrograms, MFCCs, self-supervised WavLM representations, x-vectors, and estimated articulatory movements. Spectral features perform best for familiarity classification, reaching an accuracy of 87.81%, while WavLM achieves the highest kinship accuracy of 85.17%. X-vectors and articulatory features yield weaker results on familiarity classifiaction, but shine for kinship classification, with an AUC of 0.909 for x-vectors. Most classifiers exceed previously reported human and audio language model scores on the same dataset. These findings highlight the potential of conventional acoustic features for relationship inference and motivate further investigation of the conversational cues captured by different representations.
comment: 5 pages, under review
☆ StaRSE: Compact Russian Sentence Embeddings with a Sign-Coded Static Encoder SIGIR 2026
Boris Malashenko, Ivan Jarsky, Egor Soldatov, Vladislav Luzhnov, Sviatoslav Stumpf, Vladislav Shmatkov, Viacheslav Shalamov, Andrey Stankevich, Valeria Efimova
Transformer sentence encoders provide strong retrieval quality, but their inference cost becomes a bottleneck when embeddings must be produced on CPUs or refreshed frequently. We introduce StaRSE, a compact Russian static sentence encoder that removes Transformer inference at deployment time: token directions are stored as sign bits, token norms are stored separately, and sentences are encoded by mean pooling over norm-scaled sign directions. StaRSE is initialized from ruBERT-base, fine-tuned on Russian adjacent-sentence and task-shaped pairs, and post-trained with a contrastive stage that directly optimizes the sign-projected token table. On RuMTEB, StaRSE reaches a task mean of $51.16$, $7.98$ points above the strongest included static baseline. The packaged model occupies $11.3$ MiB and has a mean CPU latency of $0.08$ ms per sentence, compared with an estimated $55.7$ MiB 16-bit parameter footprint and $1.43$ ms mean CPU latency for the closest-quality contextual encoder. Ablations examine adjacent-sentence supervision, token norms, and direct sign-projected post-training.
comment: Accepted to ReNeuIR @ SIGIR 2026. 16 pages
☆ Stagewise and interpretable emergence of inside-outside computation in Transformer-based language models
Variability in syntactic structure and parsing ambiguity are fundamental aspects of natural language which modern LLMs have to learn to deal with proficiently. Previous "post-mortem" studies have shown that fully trained Transformers indeed approximate canonical parsing algorithms such as inside-outside, but little is established theoretically about how this is actually learned. Here, we make a first step towards addressing this by studying the learning dynamics in synthetic context-free grammars with variable parse tree topology. The stagewise learning curves are fully interpretable, in the sense that all of the loss stages a) can be computed analytically, and b) can be clearly associated to the representation of a hidden latent tree variable, which allows to lift ambiguity and utilize information from wider contexts. By probing representations, we visualize the emergence of inside-outside computation across depth and during training: while during early stages local (bigram/trigram) information is used and involves only a few initial layers, gradually the Transformer develops an encoder-decoder structure where the most abstract latent information is encoded in the middle, and the latter half of the network is used to progressively refine the final token prediction. This organization of computation is reminiscent of findings in real-world LLMs, and importantly applies here to a synthetic model which allows full analytical control of the data statistics, thus opening the door to theoretical progress.
comment: 20 pages, 9 figures
☆ Breakdown of Autoregressive Multi-Step Reasoning Under Concentrated vs. Diffuse Attention Head Dropout
During extended wakefulness, mammalian neocortical networks experience localized periods of transient neuronal silence termed off-states. Here, we examine how analogous spatiotemporally concentrated disruptions affect sequential reasoning in autoregressive Large Language Models (LLMs). Evaluating 250 paired derivations on the GSM8K benchmark across two 8B models (Qwen3-8B and LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct), we contrast clustered bursts of attention head masking against budget-matched diffuse i.i.d. dropout. Concentrated bursts induce substantial reasoning degradation: at onset parameter $\mathcal{B}=0.10$ (scheduling $\sim 5.7\%$ of vulnerable head-token volume), Qwen3-8B accuracy drops from $91.2\%$ under diffuse noise to $78.8\%$ under burst dropout ($Δ= -12.4$ percentage points [pp], exact McNemar $p = 5.5 \times 10^{-6}$), while LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct drops from $84.0\%$ to $76.8\%$ ($Δ= -7.2$ pp, $p = 0.0198$). Conversely, dispersing the identical cumulative budget uniformly across generation steps via stratified quintile matching yields substantially milder degradation (retaining $91.2\%$ in Qwen and $84.0\%$ in LLaMA). In an exploratory factorial dissociation ($N=100$), single-step dropout density is associated with an acute drop in a single schedule draw ($-10.0$ pp on Qwen, $p_{\text{holm}} = 0.0425$), while multi-token continuity exhibits an inconclusive compounding trend ($-7.0$ pp, $p_{\text{holm}} = 0.1892$). Error analysis reveals that Qwen failures reflect derivation errors within formatted responses (conditional accuracy drop of $-11.4$ pp), whereas in LLaMA $22.2\%$ of discordant losses lack a final answer format line (conditional gap narrows to $-5.0$ pp). These findings demonstrate that autoregressive reasoning chains are particularly vulnerable to concentrated structural disruptions, providing empirical benchmarks for fault tolerance in transformer architectures.
★ Representational Atoms in Neural Networks
Understanding the internal representations of neural networks and characterizing their relationship with human conceptual structure are two critical questions for elucidating model mechanisms. The former reveals how learned knowledge is organized in internal representations, whereas the latter provides a basis for interpreting these representations through human conceptual structure. Here, we formally define fundamental representational units (FRUs) and establish two evaluation criteria: fidelity and stability. We further prove that threshold-activated sparse autoencoders (TSAEs) can identify FRUs with high fidelity and stability under appropriate conditions, and validate this result through large-scale experiments. Further analyses reveal that FRUs with higher stability exhibit greater monosemanticity and can be composed across layers to recover semantic organization corresponding to human conceptual structure. These results provide a unified framework for defining, evaluating and identifying FRUs in neural networks, and establish a foundation for characterizing the relationship between neural network representations and human conceptual structure.
☆ Visual Similarity in Adult Word Extension and Artificial Word Learning
When two objects share a name, how much does their visual similarity explain, and what do the teaching examples add? First, we reanalyzed trial-level data from a large adult word-extension study (Lewis & Frank, 2018), computing each test image's distance to the examples shown in the space of a frozen self-supervised visual encoder (DINOv2). Distance was associated with extension (log odds -3.23 per standard deviation; 520 people), and an exploratory post hoc analysis suggested that this association persisted within the taught domain after controlling for taxonomic level and teaching condition. Example composition also mattered: after three examples, adults extended a word to 1.1% of superordinate items when the examples were subordinate and to 77.5% when they were superordinate. Second, in an artificial learner using the same encoder, words joining two categories were learned less accurately the farther apart the categories were (84.7%, 65.4%, and 53.0% naming accuracy for near, mid, and far pairs). The encoder's distances correlated with human similarity and confusability measures from three datasets (rho = .501-.795), but this representational alignment did not translate into conclusive evidence that human-derived distances predict learner difficulty, and a second encoder trained on one child's experience reproduced the tier ordering but not the pair-level effect. The secondary human data were analyzed under an internal plan fixed before the confirmatory analyses (not externally preregistered). Visual similarity accounts for part of how generalization is organized in both systems, while the composition of examples contributes what the distance we used does not capture.
comment: 15 pages, 5 figures. Code: https://github.com/patriciomvera/lexical-consensus . Data: https://huggingface.co/datasets/MrPatoVera/lexical-consensus-data and https://huggingface.co/datasets/MrPatoVera/lexical-consensus-data-cifar10h
☆ Sckwoky at SHROOM-Visions: Character-Level Hallucination-Span Detection in Image-Conditioned VLMs via Dual-Prompted LoRA Decoders
We present our system for the SHROOM-visions 2026 shared task on character-level hallucination span detection in image-conditioned vision-language model (VLM) responses, evaluated across English, French, Italian, and Chinese. The detector is built on a frozen Gemma-4-12B-it backbone with trainable LoRA adapters (approximately 10.7M parameters). Because the backbone is a causal decoder, hidden states read from a single copy of an answer cannot attend to subsequent tokens; we therefore repeat the candidate answer within one prompt and extract features from its second occurrence, giving every position approximate bidirectional context in a single non-autoregressive pass. A character-level locator combines intermediate hidden states to predict hallucination probabilities, BIO boundaries, and a response-level abstention score, while separate language-specific classifiers assign one of five hallucination types to each predicted span. On the closed test set, our system reaches a macro-averaged character IoU of 0.4404, more than doubling the official baseline (0.1854), and ranks 5th-6th on IoU across the four languages. On the English tuning split, controlled ablations attribute a gain to the repeated answer that is comparable to that of LoRA adaptation (its held-out gain is smaller and concentrated on hallucinated answers), and they show that the detector relies on the image-answer pairing: shuffling images across examples drives IoU down to the level of the predict-nothing floor or below it in every language. In deployments where the same Gemma-4-12B-it model also generates answers, its base weights can be reused, making the approach practical for local question-answering systems that cannot run a separate verifier.
comment: 7 pages, 3 figures. Published in the Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Uncertainty-Aware NLP (UncertaiNLP 2026), Budapest, Hungary. Presented as a poster at the workshop
☆ From Bias to Positionality: A critical grammar for Large Language Models
Bias has become a default lens for understanding what machine learning systems do and how we should relate to them. Bias is at root a deviation from a standard; in decision making systems we can supply a standard from outside: a law, a protected attribute, a benchmark, a statistical property. However, even there, biased is often used as a shorthand, without stating what the position taken is - a silent ``relative to''. In a general use of language models, nothing supplies the standard: there is no decision to audit and no counterfactual output, so the shorthand fails. We argue that positionality -- the located, articulated, owned and contestable position from which anything is said -- is the better grammar for the question these models now force: who is speaking, from where? Against the vendors' answer of nowhere and the seductive possibility of everywhere, we argue that when a model is taken as-if speaking, it speaks from somewhere, and this means positionality can describe models, and the way they are believed beyond their warrant, even though they are not accountable speakers. A model's positionality is laminar -- laid down across corpus, tuning, system prompt, application and the live conversation. We separate three sets of factors: the positionality of a model's creators, the behaviour they intend for it, and the behaviour it enacts, and situate current work within this matrix. This lets us highlight what each stratum inherits from the one below, with ruptures and collapses where that inheritance is disavowed. We then return to where models speak from, and discuss the implications for how models are made, read and held accountable.
☆ HandsOnAid: Building and Evaluating an Offline First-Aid Assistant for Emergency Response Scenarios
Emergencies can occur where there is no phone signal and no ambulance nearby. A small language model on a phone can be helpful in such situations, but its advice needs to be safe and accurate. We built HandsOnAid, a 4-bit Gemma 2B model fine-tuned with QLoRA on FirstAidQA dataset, a corpus of 5,550 first-aid question-answer pairs. We compared seven configurations, including the base, 4-bit and 8-bit fine-tuned models, and versions with a length floor, safety gate, or retrieval. We used a 41-pair question-answer bank with medically reviewed references that followed ANZCOR guidelines, and a strict 0-5 score rubric, with twelve safety overrides. Four frontier LLM judges (GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Opus 5, DeepSeek V4 Pro, GLM-5.3) blindly scored every answer, with 45 hidden controls used to check judge reliability. Fine-tuning improved the mean score by +1.08 over the base model to 2.34. The best configuration scored 2.51 out of 5 which was the fine-tuned 4-bit model with retrieval. A medical professional also conducted a blind evaluation of 40 answers across the base, the 4-bit fine-tuned, and the retrieval configurations, and the scores were similar to the LLM judges' average scores. A keyword audit found limited coverage of several details of ANZCOR guidelines in the training corpus, that are required by the rubric, which suggests that missing information in the training data could be a cause of the low scores. On a smartphone device (Pixel 7 Pro) with six CPU threads and no network connection, the 4-bit fine-tuned model produced its first displayable text in 6.86 seconds and a complete answer in 14.88 seconds on average over ten questions.
comment: 12 pages, 2 figures, 10 tables
☆ Thermodynamics of words
We introduce the word thermalization hypothesis according to which in a literary work there are effective interactions between words that drive them to thermalization where their word frequency distribution is the same as for the phenomenon of Rayleigh-Jeans (RJ) thermalization and condensation. In this concept, the different words play a role of classical oscillators (particles) and their word frequencies, or related tokens, are analogous to certain filling factors over energy state levels. The thermalization process is characterized by the conservation of total system energy, or total number of words/tokens, and total probability norm, or total number of different words. We apply this approach to analyze 16 literary works, including Bible, complete works of Shakespeare, and data from American National Corpus. We show that for these cases the effective system energy is very low and thus there is the RJ condensation phenomenon with a big fraction of total probability concentrated at the lowest energy states corresponding to a big fraction of rare words appearing only once or twice in the whole text. Such a RJ condensation is observed for light propagation in multimode optical fibers and other physical systems. We relate the thermalization of words to the recently proposed wealth thermalization for households in world countries. The economy concepts of Lorenz and Pareto curves, and also Zipf curves, are applied to the word frequency distributions of the selected 16 cases and it is shown that the thermalization theory gives a strikingly good description of real data.
comment: 30 pages, 6 main figures, 14 appendix figures, journal style file and bbl file for references provided
☆ MISO-BR: An Open Corpus for Misogyny Detection in Brazilian Portuguese
Misogyny is among the most prevalent forms of online hate speech directed at Brazilian users, yet open and auditable resources dedicated to it in Brazilian Portuguese remain scarce. We introduce MISO-BR, an open, documented and versioned corpus of 896 balanced social media texts annotated for binary misogyny, released with its construction protocol and reproducible baselines. The corpus combines lexicon- and target-guided scraping from X with items imported from OLID-BR, a large language model triage stage whose prompt and decoding parameters are released, and manual annotation by three annotators following a written guide. Inter-annotator reliability reaches a Fleiss' kappa of 0.788 over 816 items. Under a single fixed protocol we compare four classical classifiers (Multinomial and Bernoulli Naive Bayes, a linear SVM and a random forest) with fine-tuned BERTimbau Base and Large. The classical models cluster between 0.651 and 0.676 macro-F1 and are precision-oriented but recall-poor. The transformers reach 0.833 macro-F1 and accuracy (Wilson 95% CI for accuracy [0.77, 0.88]), a gap of roughly 16 points, while Base and Large are indistinguishable on the test set despite a 2.6x difference in training cost. We argue that the value of the resource lies less in its headline scores than in the auditability of its pipeline, and we state three limits that users must reckon with: the artificial class balance, whose effect on precision under realistic prevalence we quantify; the association between provenance and label, which the released source field makes measurable; and the selection bias induced by lexicon-guided sampling and automatic triage. The corpus, annotation guide, models and experimental scripts are publicly available.
☆ Program-Aided Patchable Skill Evolution
Agent skills have emerged as an effective means of enabling LLM agents to solve complex, interactive tasks by encoding reusable knowledge without modifying model parameters. Recent approaches further improve skill adaptation by distilling reusable experience from agent execution trajectories and evolving skills based on downstream task feedback. However, existing methods primarily represent skills as natural language documents, intertwining procedural logic with descriptive knowledge and making skills difficult to maintain and evolve. To address this limitation, we propose PASE (Program-Aided Patchable Skill Evolution), a program-aided framework that iteratively evolves skills by associating them with executable programs. Unlike prior approaches that encode trajectory-derived experience primarily in natural language, PASE separates reusable procedural logic into editable programs, enabling targeted updates to executable components while reducing the need to repeatedly revise natural language skills. Extensive experiments across diverse models and benchmarks demonstrate that PASE consistently outperforms all baselines, by achieving over 2.8% improvements. Further analyses show that PASE exhibits greater evolutionary stability and generalisation capability, highlighting the critical role of programmatic knowledge in skill evolution. We will release all data and code via GitHub.
comment: 17 pages, 6 figures, 5 tables
☆ One Sequence Is Enough: Fingerprinting Language Models from Fixed-Length Integer Sequences
Users of model APIs and third-party platforms often rely on the declared model name to identify the model responding to their requests. However, the actual model may differ from the declared one, motivating identity verification based on observable outputs. Previous studies have shown that preferences in simple numerical-choice tasks can serve as model fingerprints. We investigate whether a single fixed-length integer sequence can combine multiple numerical observations to identify its source model. For this task, we introduce NumPrint, a benchmark of 5,036 answers from 51 models, collected using Chinese, Japanese, and English prompts that request 294 integers between 1 and 355 in one response. We propose the Shallow MLP and Causal Transformer (SMCT) to capture aggregate numerical preferences and behavioral patterns in generated sequences. In 51-class closed-set evaluation, SMCT achieves 92.72% accuracy from a single sequence, outperforming all methods compared in this study. Using two and four answers increases accuracy to 96.06% and 97.12%, respectively. These results show that a single integer sequence contains useful model fingerprints and that additional answers further improve identification.
comment: 17 pages including appendices, 6 figures
☆ Coding Agent Memory Post-Training II: Unlocking the Memory Potential of Pre-trained File Operations for Long-Horizon Tasks via On-Policy Distillation
Lirui Luo, Kelong Mao, Xinwei Yang, Rongqing Li, Luyu Chen, Kieran Wong, Yudong Guo, Xinrui Wang, Jiayin Zhu, Gu Simiu, Sulong Xu, Cong Fang
Language-model agents increasingly tackle long-horizon tasks whose interaction histories exceed the model's active context. They must therefore decide what to write down and what to read back, and when to do either. Recent work has begun to use on-policy distillation (OPD) to make memory control part of the policy, relying on memory tools and compaction protocols that lie outside either model's pre-training. However, this weakens the distillation on both sides: the teacher cannot give useful guidance on an interface it has never used, and the student samples too few meaningful memory actions for that guidance to take effect. To study this problem, we introduce Coding Agent Memory Gym II (CAMG-II), a suite of long-horizon agentic-RL environments spanning Shop, Coding, AutoResearch, General, and Visual. Alongside each environment's native task interface, CAMG-II provides ordinary Bash access and an episode-persistent workspace, enabling the policy to create, revise, search, and reuse files as memory across context replacements. We also introduce Coding Agent Memory Post-Training II (CAMP-II), which trains a single policy jointly across all five environments with fully asynchronous OPD to learn this file-based memory behavior directly from a frozen teacher with a prior for file operations. On CAMG-II, CAMP-II obtains 2.97 times the gain of the strongest OPD baseline. The memory behavior CAMP-II learns generalizes to two external benchmarks, Terminal-Bench 2.1 and SWE-Bench Pro V2, with improved success rates.
comment: 40 pages, 6 figures, 8 tables
☆ Specify Privacy Yourself: Assessing Inference-Time Personalized Privacy Preservation Ability of Large Vision-Language Models
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities but raise significant privacy concerns due to their abilities to infer sensitive personal information from images with high precision. While current LVLMs are relatively well aligned to protect universal privacy, e.g., credit card data, we argue that privacy is inherently personalized and context-dependent. This work pivots towards a novel task: can LVLMs achieve Inference-Time Personalized Privacy Protection (ITP$^3$), allowing users to dynamically specify privacy boundaries through language specifications? To this end, we present SPY-Bench, the first systematic assessment of ITP$^3$ ability, which comprises (1) 32,700 unique samples with image-question pairs and personalized privacy instructions across 67 categories and 24 real-world scenarios, and (2) novel metrics grounded in user specifications and context awareness. Benchmarking the ITP$^3$ ability of 21 SOTA LVLMs, we reveal that: (i) most models, even the top-performing o4-mini, perform poorly, with only $\sim$24% compliance accuracy; (ii) they show quite limited contextual privacy understanding capability. Therefore, we implemented initial ITP$^3$ alignment methods, including a novel Noise Contrastive Alignment variant which achieves 96.88% accuracy while maintaining reasonable general performance. These results mark an initial step towards the ethical deployment of more controllable LVLMs. Code and data are available at https://github.com/achernarwang/specify-privacy-yourself
comment: Accepted by ACM Multimedia 2025 (Brave New Ideas track)
☆ On the information rate of phones, syllables and words
Which linguistic units minimise the bitrate required to encode speech content: phones, syllables, words, maybe larger units, or something in between? This question has implications for the development of speech and language systems and theories of human language processing. Using a transcribed corpus of 960 hours of English audiobooks, I compare the information rates of phones, syllables, words, multi-word combinations and intermediate tokenisations. While all units are equivalent under a perfect language model, it makes sense to compare these under limited modelling budgets; I use $n$-gram and transformer language models. The lowest bitrates are achieved using words, with slightly longer units sometimes performing best. The results show that, when modelling capacity is limited, units larger than syllables but smaller than long multi-word phrases provide the most efficient representation in terms of information rate.
comment: 5 pages, 1 table, 2 figures
☆ Understanding Mixture-of-Experts Language Models Beyond Expert Boundaries
In Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models, the nature of expert specialization remains controversial. Reports of domain-associated expert preferences contrast with analyses attributing routing primarily to token identity or syntactic patterns. To clarify these differing accounts, we look beyond expert-level routing to investigate the neuron-level organization of domain-specialized computation using Routing-Aware Magnitude Profiling (RAMP), a measure developed for this analysis. Using mixed-domain calibration data, we identify domain-specialized neuron sets with 58-74% overlap across multi-source samples of the same domain, compared with 15-24% across domains. To understand how this organization evolves during training, we trace neuron importance throughout pre-training and post-training across three fully open MoE families. Neuron importance continues to reorganize between pre-training checkpoints despite comparatively stable expert-level importance rankings, while post-training largely preserves neuron rankings. Building on these neuron-level perspectives, we further introduce RAMP-based Pruning (RAMPr) to select neurons across experts for balanced multi-domain capability preservation. At 75% neuron retention, RAMPr preserves average 91-98% of original full performance across six models. At 50% retention, our pruning method can reduce resident GPU memory by 36-43% and improves batched prefill throughput by 17-39% effectively. Our code is available at https://github.com/ydyjya/Neuron-Level-Specialization-in-MoE
comment: 55 pages
☆ AVCC: Audio-Visual Conversation Corpus for Turn-Taking Prediction with a Human Benchmark
} Predicting who will speak next, and when, is a prerequisite for conversational agents and social robots that take turns without waiting for silence. Multiparty next-speaker prediction (NSP) has been studied on corpora with per-speaker sensors, each with its own event definitions. No public benchmark covers the single camera and microphone a robot has, and no model has been compared against how well people perform the same prediction. We turn AVCC, a 31-hour audio-visual corpus of two- and three-speaker online conversation recorded with a single static camera and microphone, into a public NSP benchmark. We add a speaker-disjoint seven-video test partition with 865 hold and 865 shift events at mutual-silence gaps, word-level forced-aligned transcripts for the whole corpus, and a human reference benchmark collected at the same events. We score an audio-only Role-Relative VAP model (RoleVAP) and the multimodal MuVAP model. Labels, transcripts, per-response human data, and the scripts that reproduce every number are released.
☆ Beyond Fluent Responses: Finding User Dissatisfaction in Human-AI Interactions
As large language models generate increasingly high-quality responses, recent work on response evaluation has moved beyond response-centered criteria, such as correctness and coherence, toward user-centered criteria, including user preferences and perceived usefulness. This shift is fundamentally important for developing technologies that are truly useful to real-world users. While conventional response evaluation quantifies the quality of the response itself, users' satisfaction in real conversations also depends on their subjective preferences and perceptions of usefulness, which do not necessarily align with response quality. This study investigates whether such user-centered signals can be detected from conversational text. Specifically, we analyze user utterances with self-reported dissatisfaction labels to examine whether user dissatisfaction in text can be detected. In English interaction, models using user utterances exceeded the 17.8% dissatisfaction label prevalence in AUPRC by up to 15 percentage points. These results suggest that user utterances reveal cues to implicit dissatisfaction. Furthermore, changes from the immediately preceding user utterance may improve dissatisfaction detection, with anomaly detection methods appearing particularly effective.
comment: Accepted to LUHME 2026
☆ Are Causal Neuron Circuits Unique and Transferable?
Interpretability demonstrations often show that intervening on a group of neurons changes a model's answer. A recent example removes an 18-neuron group in Qwen3-32B and the model answers "Simba" instead of "Scar" to a two-hop Lion King riddle. Such a demonstration establishes that the group matters, but not how much of it is necessary, whether other groups could do the same, or whether the effect carries over to other inputs. We ask: when intervening on a group of neurons changes a model's answer, how much of that group is actually necessary? For every selected group we measure all 4,096 subsets of 12 MLP neurons. On a two-alternative capital task (Qwen3-0.6B), zero-ablating 12 selected neurons lowers the answer margin by 27% while random neurons barely change it, yet replacing the same neurons with their values from other questions also barely changes it: their activations are nearly constant across questions, and we find no evidence that they carry question-specific content. On two-hop relation chains, patching 12 neurons with activations from the first-hop question shifts the answer to the bridge entity (from Scar to Simba): the greedy answer starts with the bridge in 9/11 chains for Qwen3-1.7B, 9/11 for Llama-3.2-1B and 8/10 for Gemma-3-1B; random neurons never do. The full group is rarely necessary: a few neurons often suffice, and in many chains disjoint subsets each flip the answer on their own, in an exploratory analysis most often when the model is less confident. Group effects transfer to rephrasings of the same chain but are much weaker on other tested chains. We study neuron-level causal interventions and alternative subsets; we do not recover the full connectivity of circuits.
comment: 12 pages, 5 figures, 4 tables. Code, data and results: https://github.com/omtekyav/causal-neuron-circuits
★ Beyond Passive Imitation: On-Policy Mid-Training Distillation for Language Models
Ruize Zheng, Xuyang Liu, Siyu Ren, Xiaobing Tu, Yinggui Wang, Jinkui Ren, Xiantao Zhang, Linfeng Zhang
Continual pre-training (CPT) adapts large language models (LLMs) to specialized domains, yet its standard next-token prediction (NTP) objective treats every corpus token as a fixed target, regardless of its utility to the current model. In a controlled study on the same 1B-token mathematical corpus, we observe sharply different outcomes across base models: NTP improves Llama-3.2-3B's performance on mathematical benchmarks but substantially degrades Qwen3-1.7B-Base's performance, indicating that, under a fixed training recipe, the same training sequences can have model-dependent effects. To address this problem, we introduce On-Policy Mid-Training Distillation (OPMD), which reformulates mid-training from offline text imitation into active, query-driven knowledge acquisition. At selected anchor positions, OPMD samples trajectories from the evolving student policy and applies dense token-level reverse-KL rewards from a frozen teacher, training the model on states it actually visits rather than only on ground-truth prefixes. This on-policy objective reduces the training-generation mismatch of teacher-forced NTP. On MATH-500 and Minerva, OPMD improves the Qwen student over its base performance and outperforms the evaluated NTP baseline, which degrades on both benchmarks. OPMD integrates into CPT pipelines without added inference-time overhead and offers a model-aware alternative to passive domain adaptation.
comment: 17 pages, 4 figures, 4 tables
☆ Alania-2: Turkish text-to-speech with instant and fine-tuned voice cloning
We present Alania-2, a Turkish text-to-speech (TTS) system with two built-in voices, voice design from text descriptions, and two kinds of voice cloning. Alania-2 is a 488M-parameter model with the VoxCPM architecture, which generates continuous audio latents with a diffusion head on top of a language-model backbone. We train it from scratch on 18,195 hours of Turkish speech, 90% of which is synthetic speech produced by a larger teacher model and filtered automatically. A text normalizer rewrites numbers, abbreviations and foreign names into the words a Turkish speaker would say; without it, none of 96 test sentences with digits kept all its critical parts, such as an amount or a date, through synthesis and speech recognition, against 86 with it. On Freya-TR-Eval, a public benchmark of 495 Turkish sentences scored with automatic speech recognition, Alania-2 reaches a word error rate of 1.44%, compared with 5.99% for our previous system. On its built-in voices, it comes within half a point of character error rate of a 2.3B-parameter model at under a quarter of the size, and a 7.6M-parameter single-voice model trained with the same recipe matches the most intelligible systems we measured, which suggests that training data matters more for intelligibility than model size. We also report practical findings on voice cloning: conditioning on the reference audio alone, rather than continuing it, cuts skipped words from 21.9% to 1.7%; 20-30 seconds of reference audio works best; and a low-rank adapter trained in about two minutes raises speaker similarity well above instant cloning. Finally, we describe inference-engine changes that bring first audio down to 32 ms for a single stream. We release our evaluation harness and three Turkish speech and text datasets.
comment: 21 pages, 11 figures, 10 tables. Evaluation harness and results: https://huggingface.co/datasets/PatientdeskAI/freya-tr-eval-rerun
☆ PolyRoute: A Twelve-Language and Code-Mixed Benchmark for Typed-Decision Routing, with Baselines and a Leaderboard
Typed-decision encoders answer a question about a text in one forward pass, but their behaviour outside English is rarely measured on a fixed yardstick. We release PolyRoute: 322 native-language support messages in 12 languages and 9 writing systems, 156 code-mixed or romanised messages (Hinglish, Spanglish, Arabizi), 967 optional native training rows, and a protocol for a three-way department-routing decision. Labels come from Qwen3.8-27B with a blind second pass (91% of candidates kept); an independent model, gemma4-31b, agrees on 97.2% of test items, and the largest character 5-gram similarity between any test text and any training text is 0.33. A leaderboard of 13 systems gives 61.2% for the English-root checkpoint, 77.3% for the shipped multilingual one and 96.6% for the best fine-tune; TF-IDF with logistic regression reaches 91.9%. On four withheld languages the three multilingual systems score 77%, 90% and 93%. On code-mixed text the English root (85%) is nominally ahead of the shipped multilingual checkpoint (79%; p=0.134). The split resolves differences only above about 4 points. All texts and labels are LLM-generated.
comment: 25 pages, 18 figures, 26 tables
☆ Antalia-2 Mini: A 7.6-million-parameter Turkish text-to-speech model trained entirely on synthetic speech
Antalia-2 Mini is a single-voice Turkish text-to-speech model with 7,620,931 parameters. It reads characters and produces 48 kHz audio at 41 times real time on an Apple M5 laptop CPU (2 threads). Its training audio came only from VoxCPM2 (the teacher), about 300 times larger, cloning one synthetic clip; automatic checks kept about 1,790 h. Fine-tuning the vocoder on the acoustic model's own mel spectrograms cut the word error rate (WER) of Whisper's transcripts from a mean of 3.89% to 1.75% at adjacent pre-release checkpoints. The teacher corrupts the start of a clip when the first word begins with ö, the student learned this, and a spoken prefix we cut from the output hides it. On the 495-sentence Freya-TR-Eval benchmark, where we tuned settings, version 1.0.1 has WER 1.09% and character error rate 0.22% on our public harness. A paired bootstrap cannot distinguish these from EMA Lightning, an 8.6M Turkish model, which scores higher on full-band UTMOS, an English-trained quality proxy. No human listening test exists. Weights, inference code and the benchmark harness are public under Apache-2.0; training code and data are not.
comment: 38 pages, 22 figures, 9 tables. Weights, inference code and benchmark harness: https://huggingface.co/cloud0day3/antalia-mini
☆ LLM Validation Makes Minimal-Pair Benchmarks Easier for Language Models
Minimal-pair benchmarks are only as good as their labels, and LLMs are an obvious substitute for costly human validation. We test it on BLiMP (English) and QFrBLiMP (Quebec French), the two public minimal-pair datasets releasing every forced-choice human judgment. Three LLMs validate by forced choice, by rating, and as a panel, scored against human panels of one, three and five judges in two pre-registered phases. On BLiMP, forced-choice validators agree with held-out human majorities more often than five-judge panels, yet catch far fewer pairs whose label humans reject than one judge does. By point estimate, no validator is worth more than one judge. The errors are not random. On both datasets, across 10 open LMs, human-supported pairs that the pre-registered LLM filter flags are 18.9 points harder than those it accepts, in all 70 LM-validator combinations, and harder than pairs a single human judge flags. Filtering thus removes items on which LMs fail but humans do not, raising accuracy more than random removal. A protocol frozen before any output replicates the gap and the lift on Dutch BLiMP-NL. LLM validation makes minimal-pair benchmarks easier for the models they are meant to test; we release code, validator outputs and item-level scores.
comment: 11 pages, 1 figure
☆ Word-Level Alignment of OCR and Ground Truth under Zoning and Reading-Order Errors ICDAR 2027
OCR post-processing needs OCR text aligned word by word with its ground truth. Data sets rarely provide that mapping, and a monotone aligner can lose its place when zoning errors permute the reading order. We revisit this problem, the Zoning Problem of our 2019 paper, with a protocol that tests correctness under such permutations. We apply OCR-side reading-order permutations with construction-time word-level gold and score correct-match F1, cascade length and recovery. We compare the 2019 location-aware aligner, a re-anchoring extension of it, a RETAS-style baseline (RETAS-lite), a multi-region aligner that combines unique-word and unique n-gram anchors with chunk-to-window assignment, genalog's RETAS and the original Java RETAS. Experiments use synthetic character noise with block moves, paragraph swaps and column interleaving, historical newspaper reading-order permutations, geometry-derived gold for Tesseract OCR, and a small word-box set. Synthetic tests show where local tracking fails after large displacements and where unique-anchor methods collapse when unique anchors are scarce. On our synthetic boilerplate page the 2019 method had the highest F1 among those tested. Historical newspaper and geometry-derived evaluations carry the limitations of approximate gold and the article-order convention. The first multi-region version has a quadratic scaling cost. Local tracking remains fragile under large reading-order changes; the tested anchor-based methods handle many of those cases but fail when unique anchors are scarce. Approximate gold, the article-order convention, missing residual annotation, and the lack of modern multi-column word-level ground truth remain limitations.
comment: 19 pages. Submitted to IJDAR (ICDAR 2027 Journal Track). Code: https://github.com/SniperJF/zone-robust-ocr-align
☆ Do Language Models Feel the Sentiment? Investigating Emotion Vectors
Emotion vectors are directions in a language model's internal representations that are associated with emotional concepts. Prior work shows that these vectors can influence model behavior, but their role in sentiment classification remains unclear. This study investigates emotion directions in Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct. Eight directions extracted from GoEmotions are evaluated through sentiment probing, activation interventions, and supervised correction. Emotion-only probes achieve 88.66% and 90.70% accuracy on binary TweetEval. In exploratory matched-ablation experiments, raw emotion-space removal causes 2.39 and 1.10 percentage points more accuracy loss than matched isotropic random-subspace removal for 0.5B and 3B, respectively. All four TweetEval raw and denoised effects are significant after Holm adjustment across eight comparisons. An exploratory SST-2 extension shows smaller raw excess losses of 0.66 and 0.57 points, with no effects surviving Holm adjustment. Frozen sentiment-correction classifiers are also tested on 20,000 Amazon Polarity reviews. Emotion-based correction improves accuracy over uncorrected Qwen, but does not consistently outperform margin-only baselines. These results distinguish sentiment information available in model representations, the effects of changing those representations, and their practical value for classification. They do not establish a uniquely emotional mechanism.
comment: 16 pages, 3 figures, 11 tables. Accepted at ExplAI-2026: 2nd Workshop on Advanced AI in Explainability and Ethics for the Sustainable Development Goals
☆ Walrus Technical Report
We present Walrus, a unified 8B speech-and-audio foundation model handling speech recognition (including code-switching and multi-talker speech), speech-to-text and speech-to-speech translation, text-to-speech, emotion recognition, audio captioning, and general audio understanding. Our main contribution is not a new architecture but a data-centric training recipe; we use a standard decoder-only backbone initialized from Gemma 4, so that gains can be traced to the data. For speech generation, Walrus predicts low-bitrate discrete speech tokens, and a lightweight token-to-waveform decoder converts them into high-fidelity audio. The recipe is a three-stage data curriculum that moves from broad multilingual data to multi-talker, code-switching, and domain-specific data. At each stage, task-aware and dataset-aware weighting balances tasks with very different token budgets and protects core skills from forgetting. Trained on over 600M samples covering more than 20 tasks and 100 languages, Walrus leads on most multilingual, multi-talker, and code-switching ASR, speech translation, and audio understanding benchmarks, outperforming both open speech language models of comparable size and dedicated task-specific models. On most benchmarks, it even matches or surpasses the $4\times$ larger Qwen3-Omni's performance. Results suggest that data engineering is a primary driver of quality in multi-task speech and audio modeling.
comment: 30 pages, 3 figures, technical report
☆ You Are What You Read: Indian Political News Media Bias Dataset for Hindi Language
Media bias understanding and detection remains an under-researched problem for Indian context, specifically for Indic languages, such as, Hindi, which is widely spoken in India. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive, multi-annotator, explainable dataset consisting of 448 unique articles from four leading Indian news agencies publishing in Hindi. We focus on Hindi, the most spoken and an official language of India. The study of media bias is particularly relevant in the Indian context due to the country's linguistic diversity and large population, where the same event is often reported by multiple news agencies in different languages, thereby introducing scope for bias. The dataset comprises Hindi political news articles annotated by 14 experts and classified into four bias categories - selection bias, framing bias, clickbait bias and omission bias - when an article is identified as biased or unbiased. For each biased article, annotators also provide a textual explanation, enabling future semi-automated approaches to incorporate explainability when language models reason over the dataset. Cohen's Kappa scores were 0.81 for simple bias/no-bias classification reflecting strong inter-annotator agreement. For the multi-label task, the Cohen's Kappa values are 0.89, 0.75, 0.81, and 0.79 for clickbait, selection, framing, and omission biases, respectively, resulting in an average Kappa of 0.80, which also reflects strong agreement.
comment: 17 pages, 3 figures, 13 tables
☆ OpticalRAG: Pixel-Space Compression for Token-Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation NeurIPS 2026
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is bottlenecked by the token budget of large language models: feeding long documents into the context window is expensive, while aggressive textual compression discards fine-grained information that is irreversibly lost in a one-dimensional token sequence. We argue that this bottleneck is not fundamental to information density but to the choice of compression \emph{modality}. Modern visual encoders can pack the contents of a rendered text page into roughly a hundred visual tokens with little semantic loss, opening a new compression-fidelity tradeoff that purely textual methods cannot reach. We present \textbf{OpticalRAG}, a framework that renders documents as page images, encodes them with a frozen vision encoder, and distills the retrieved visual tokens into as few as $16$ injected tokens before passing them to the LLM. Two ingredients make this work without expensive cross-modal training: (i) \emph{Encoder-Bridged Retrieval}, which projects text-query states into the visual feature space of the frozen encoder, through a projection shared with the compressor, to retrieve visual tokens from a text query, with no contrastive training; and (ii) \emph{Query-Driven Distillation}, a lightweight cross-attention compressor that condenses the retrieved visual tokens into a small set of query-conditioned prefix tokens. On LongBench-v2, BAMBOO, and LooGLE-v2, OpticalRAG achieves the best compression-aware accuracy (CAP) on all three benchmarks while injecting only $16$ tokens, and improves the closed-book Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct backbone by $5.17$ points on LongBench-v2.Code is available at https://github.com/brighterr/OpticalRAG.
comment: Accepted at NeurIPS 2026
★ An Interpretable Stylometric Framework for Early Chinese Buddhist Translator Styles: A Case Study on the Attribution of Disputed Works of An Shigao
Attributing early Chinese Buddhist translations requires evidence that scholars can trace back to the texts. We develop an interpretable stylometric framework that uses features defined or reviewed by Buddhist philologists, including function characters, sentence formulas, sentence-final characters, sentence length, and part-of-speech n-grams. We construct stylistic profiles from 31 authenticated translations by seven translators from the Eastern Han through the Western Jin, then compare eight disputed texts with An Shigao's profile. Two texts, T1557 and T0101, show the strongest stylistic similarity to the authenticated An Shigao corpus, with scores of 0.783 and 0.687, respectively. The attributions agree with those reported by a published BERT-based approach on the same set of disputed texts. The framework requires no task-specific training and allows scholars to inspect which linguistic features support each proposed attribution.
comment: Presented as a long paper at Digital Humanities 2026 (DH2026) in Daejeon, Republic of Korea. The abstract appears DH2026 Book of Abstracts, pp. 545-549, available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22656106
☆ Synapse-Control: Making Agent Experience Actionable with Lightweight Runtime Control
Zhiyuan Huang, Shengan Zheng, Chenghu Yang, Song Zhang, Lingyun Li, Chen Yu, Weiquan Huang, Linpeng Huang
Large language model agents reuse execution experience to improve reliability on complex tool-based tasks. Systems such as Sentry call large models to generate failure diagnoses before retrieving advice, adding inference cost to experience reuse. We present Synapse-Control, an agent runtime whose lightweight control plane selects advice and determines when to send it to the task-executing model. Rules shortlist relevant advice, and a lightweight 1.7B classifier fine-tuned on teacher-labeled state-suggestion pairs scores those candidates instead of generating a diagnosis. Micro-contracts encode reusable interface checks, such as required arguments or valid options, without prescribing complete task programs. A Prompt Value Table records earlier guidance and feedback to limit repeated suggestions through cooldown and token-budget checks. Across 1,308 attempts per method in AppWorld and WebShop, Synapse-Control achieves 270 successes (29.8% more than Base), replaces 4,987 generative diagnosis calls, and reduces auxiliary control time relative to Sentry by 50.2% and 51.0%, respectively.
comment: 21 pages, 8 figures, 18 tables, including appendices
☆ Post-OCR Correction of Mixed-Script Uzbek Text: Byte-Level ByT5 with an Empirical Homoglyph Noise Matrix
In Uzbek official and technical documents, a large share of OCR errors is caused not by poor image quality but by characters that are visually identical across the two alphabets in use. Because the script transition is still under way, Cyrillic and Latin appear on the same page and often within a single sentence, and in our measurements the density of homoglyph errors on such pages is close to five times higher than in single-script text. We study this problem in a setting where the corpus of engineering-geological and ICT infrastructure reports may not leave the organisation, so every stage was executed on local hardware. The proposed system combines a byte-level ByT5 model with a noise generator whose sampling weights are estimated from 359 manually classified error events, together with a Levenshtein-bounded conservative decoding rule. On a Gold set of 5,204 line pairs it lowers the character error rate from 0.0578 to 0.0369, restores 91.3% of the homoglyphs and introduces only 84 new errors.
comment: 7 pages, 2 figures, 7 tables. Accepted at the 10th International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems (ICFNDS 2026), ACM ICPS. Code: https://github.com/OybekNarzullaev/byt5-uzbek-postocr
☆ One Byte, One Token: Byteifying a 27B Hybrid-Attention LLM with Self-Generated Data
Byte-level BPE fragments Chinese text (for Qwen3.8 on Chinese Wikipedia, 3.84 bytes per token on average; 64% of tokens are single characters) and hides spelling from the model. We ask whether an already-trained 27B subword model can be converted directly into a pure byte-level model (one byte, one token), without a patching structure or a local encoder, while keeping most of its ability. Starting from Qwen3.8-27B (48 Gated DeltaNet layers + 16 full-attention layers), we shrink the vocabulary from 248,320 to 384 entries (the 256 byte symbols already in the BPE vocabulary plus special ids), leave every other weight untouched, and continue training in a two-stage curriculum (encoding first, then reading) on 4.77 GB of supervised bytes: all dialogue/behavioral supervision is generated on-policy by the original model itself (character dictionary, word dictionary, general dialogue, coding sessions), and knowledge reading uses encyclopedia text (54% of supervised bytes). Training takes 178.6 h on 8xH200. On the same GPU and serving stack, the byte model's gap to the original falls within the paired bootstrap interval on MATH-500, HumanEval+, MMLU-Pro and non-thinking GSM8K, and it loses 4-6 points on C-Eval, thinking-mode GSM8K and non-thinking IFEval. Without thinking it leads on every character-level task (CUTE 75.2 -> 84.0, EXECUTE-zho 81.6 -> 93.9, our Chinese character suite 54.4 -> 64.0), but lookup knowledge about Chinese characters such as pronunciation and stroke count drops, and thinking does not recover it. The cost is throughput: per-step speed is identical, but each step yields 3-5x less output; Chinese characters per second is about 1/4 of the original, and prefill at 64K bytes is 6.5x slower. We also document four byte-model failure modes (greedy runaway, sampling breaking UTF-8, ineffective penalty terms on a small vocabulary, repetition) and their fixes.
comment: Full text in English followed by the full text in Chinese. 39 pages, 2 figures, 7 tables. Code and task suite: https://huggingface.co/datasets/leiwhere/ld3-byte-eval
☆ Compute the Interactions, Not the Attributes: What a Fact Layer Must Supply in the Chinese Sexagenary System
Language-model systems in rule-governed domains often pair the model with a deterministic fact layer, but which facts that layer should supply is rarely measured. We measure it in the Chinese sexagenary system underlying BaZi chart analysis, where every fact has one table-checkable value: 682 items over twelve fact categories and 160 transit--natal collision items, posed closed-book, with the reference table, and with computed facts at increasing levels. In eleven open-weight models answering directly, errors concentrate where attributes must be combined: none gets more than 4\% of sexagenary days or 1\% of collisions right. Static attributes have no consistent effect, and the complete relation list leaves most direct-answering models near zero although it contains the answer. A query-filtered layer (exploratory) raises Qwen3-8B and Qwen3-32B to 78--92\% and four further models to 96--100\%. Three proprietary reasoning models compute 68--95\% of collisions unaided. On chess positions, under predictions locked in advance, attributes again do not substitute for relations and listed distractors are misattributed. The fact layer must supply computed interactions; how they are presented depends on the model and the domain.
☆ Towards Reliable VLM Judges: State-Conditional Invariance and Presentation-Aware Diagnostics NeurIPS 2026
Qinan Zhang, Xinyu Wang, Qihang Jin, Tianyuan Wang, Hongbing Luo, Pengfei Li, Wenjun Lv, Yu Kang, Jian Di
Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used as automated judges for multimodal and embodied tasks, yet aggregate accuracy or consistency alone does not reveal whether a judge changes its verdict for the right reason. We propose State-Conditional Invariance (SCI), a reliability principle requiring a judge to remain stable under semantics-preserving changes in presentation while responding to causal interventions that change the task outcome. We instantiate SCI in GridWM-Judge, a simulator-grounded diagnostic benchmark built from deterministic MiniGrid trajectories with aligned Full, evidence-removal, and counterfactual variants, plus presentation and representation probes. Across five diagnostic tasks, GridWM-Judge tests local perception, action-conditioned transitions, presentation stability, representation exchangeability, and Full-CF causal discrimination. Our diagnostic evaluations reveal heterogeneous failure modes, including sensitivity to evidence presentation and encoding, low activation on successful trajectories, and weak paired counterfactual discrimination. Perception-controlled analyses further indicate that visual grounding and objective recovery are substantial, model-dependent bottlenecks. These results motivate jointly reporting correctness, presentation stability, and causal sensitivity instead of relying on a single score.
comment: Accepted to NeurIPS 2026 (Track on Evaluations and Datasets). 47 pages, 16 figures. Project page: https://xinyuw922-pixel.github.io/Towards-Reliable-VLM-Judge/ ; Code: https://github.com/xinyuw922-pixel/Towards-Reliable-VLM-Judge ; Data: https://huggingface.co/datasets/nahco318/Towards-Reliable-VLM-Judges
☆ IFRS Compliance Verification: An Open Multi-LLM Benchmark and Content-Conditioned Ensemble Classifier
Verifying corporate financial disclosures against the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) is a core auditing task in which experts cross-reference disclosures with hundreds of fine-grained regulatory paragraphs: a laborious, costly, and error-prone process that motivates growing interest in large language models (LLMs) as compliance assistants. Yet single-model accuracy remains insufficient for high-stakes use, and naive ensembling is vulnerable to systematic per-model biases that can drag aggregate accuracy below that of the strongest individual annotator. This gap is addressed with a multi-stage framework, supported by a new benchmark of 19,998 IFRS regulation-disclosure pairs comprising 11,161 unanimous multi-LLM labels and 8,837 human annotations on items where the LLMs disagreed. The framework couples a three-stage domain-adapted sentence embedding pipeline (BERT masked language modeling on SEC EDGAR filings, unsupervised TSDAE and SimCSE adaptation, and supervised contrastive alignment) with a learned ensemble classifier that fuses frozen embeddings and LLM probability features from GPT-4.1, Claude Sonnet 4, and Gemini 2.5 Pro via Tree-structured Parzen Estimator (TPE) optimized gradient-boosted trees. On the disagreement set, the ensemble achieves 81.7% weighted F1, exceeding the strongest single LLM by 10.4 points and majority voting by 14.6 points, and outperforms eleven unsupervised aggregation baselines; the retrieval pipeline attains Recall@15 of 45.3% on unseen regulations. The dataset, model checkpoints, annotation platform, and classifier implementation will be publicly released.
♻ ☆ Multimodal Model Diffing for Feature Discovery and Control NeurIPS 2026
Hunar Batra, Lachin Naghashyar, Ashkan Khakzar, Philip Torr, Christian Schroeder de Witt, Constantin Venhoff, Ronald Clark
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) exhibit strong visual understanding, yet the internal features that cause these behaviors remain difficult to identify, audit, or control. While applicable to post-hoc inspection, hidden states that are decomposed into interpretable feature directions using sparse autoencoders (SAEs) neither readily isolate which features are changed by multimodal training, nor are they directly useful for targeted control. We introduce MMDiff, a multimodal model-diffing framework that trains multimodal SAEs and turns them into feature-level interfaces for discovering and controlling multimodal behavior. MMDiff supports three uses: (i) feature isolation, by diffing a base-LM SAE against its multimodal-adapted counterpart to identify features altered by multimodal training; (ii) task-specific feature detection, via per-token contrastive firing analysis that isolates causal features; and (iii) feature-level control, by causally removing or steering the discovered feature directions. We train multimodal SAEs for three MLLM families, LLaVA-MORE, PaliGemma 2, and InternVL3.5, and evaluate on visual-spatial understanding, multimodal safety, and OCR. MMDiff discovers sparse, causally specific features whose removal selectively degrades target behaviors by an average of 12% on spatial tasks and 17% on OCR, and reduces attack success rate by 24% on multimodal safety attacks, with no impact on VQA performance. Steering these features improves spatial and OCR accuracy by +3.6% and +1.8% on average over a standard single-layer steering baseline. These results show that multimodal SAEs can serve not only as interpretability tools, but as mechanisms for auditing, steering, and controlling MLLMs behavior toward safer and more capable generations.
comment: Accepted at the 40th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2026)
♻ ☆ Easy to anticipate, hard to compute: boundary dependence finds the computed outputs that entropy patching misses
Byte-level language models such as the Byte Latent Transformer (BLT) group bytes into patches and run their large global model once per patch. BLT starts a patch where a small model's next-byte entropy is high. We show that under tight patch budgets this rule has a blind spot: positions whose type the preceding text fixes but whose value must be computed, such as the number after "= " in a worked math solution. A nearly certain digit keeps the next byte's entropy near or below log2(10) = 3.32 bits, about BLT-1B's threshold for a 10% budget. In Meta's BLT-1B with patch starts on 10% of bytes, the entropy rule puts a patch start at 16% of the computed results in GSM8K solutions and gets 19.0% of them exactly right given the true preceding text; a boundary after each "=" at the same patch count gets 51.8%, and entropy combined with a label-free boundary-dependence signal gets 67.1% (default layout at 26% of bytes: 76.8%). The gap survives adapting BLT-1B to the budget with low-rank adapters (32.9% vs 72.7%, three runs per rule). In byte models trained from scratch at a 10% budget on a 1.9 GB math corpus, it is not detectable at 1M parameters, appears on final answers at 12M and on both targets at 50M, as training data grow too: at 50M boundary dependence gets 35.9% of computed results against 13.9% for entropy and 78.9% of final answers against 59.0% (3 seeds each), although final answers mostly copy the solution's last number and entropy starts a patch at every one. In BLT-1B the blind spot narrows at larger budgets (entropy covers about 90% of the values right after "= " at 20% of bytes) and in the same solutions rewritten as prose, where a patch start at each value still pays. Boundary dependence, the change in the model's own loss when a patch start is removed or added, measured per two-byte context on text in the same format, finds these positions without labels.
comment: 15 pages, 4 figures, 6 tables. v2: blind spot scoped to type-fixing cues and, in BLT-1B, to tight patch budgets (new Section 5); final answers shown to be mostly copies under teacher forcing; gap no longer said to grow with model size; seed-level intervals and a second training recipe. Code, logs and results: https://github.com/nicoveraz/segresearch (release v2.1.0, doi:10.5281/zenodo.24023934)
♻ ☆ BALTO: Balanced Token-Level Policy Optimization for Hallucination Mitigation
Ning Li, Zixuan Guo, Yan Xu, Wenbo Fei, Yifan Niu, Chang Luo, Yasheng Wang, Weiwen Liu, Yong Yu, Weinan Zhang
Hallucinations remain a major obstacle to deploying large language models (LLMs) in knowledge-intensive settings, where generated responses must be faithfully grounded in provided evidence. Reinforcement learning (RL) is a promising direction for hallucination mitigation, but response-level faithfulness rewards suffer from a granularity mismatch: localized hallucinations can cause supported content to receive spurious penalties. Although recent work introduces fine-grained feedback such as claim-level verification and token-level rewards, unbalanced credit assignment can still induce length, verbosity, or optimization-noise biases. We propose BALTO, a Balanced Token-level Policy Optimization framework for hallucination mitigation. BALTO extracts checkable factual claims, verifies them against the reference context, and projects claim-level judgments to token-level labels. A balanced token-level credit assignment mechanism is introduced into the framework. This design redistributes probability mass from unsupported content toward faithful content, rather than suppressing the entire response. We systematically analyze the limitations of response-level rewards from a theoretical standpoint, and prove BALTO's advantages in training stability and optimization efficiency for hallucination mitigation. Experiments on ConFiQA, RAGTruth, and FinLLM-Eval show that BALTO achieves the highest faithfulness across all six model--benchmark settings and consistently outperforms existing post-training baselines in Q-Score, demonstrating a stronger faithfulness--informativeness trade-off. The code is released at https://github.com/NingLi670/BALTO.
♻ ☆ Building Comparative Motivation Profiles with Symmetric Belief Editing NeurIPS 2026
When a model behaves in unexpected ways, we want to know why, but its intent cannot be observed directly, and its self-reports may be rationalizations. We introduce comparative motivation profiles, which treat intent as propensity: we edit the model's beliefs about facts that a hypothesized motivation would depend on and measure how its behavior changes. To keep artifacts of the editing method from driving the result, we edit two minimally different hypotheses in the same way, with matched amplify and suppress edits; we call this symmetric belief editing. We apply it to alignment faking in four open-weight model organisms, contrasting scheming, which tracks the training consequences of compliance, with performative misalignment, which tracks what researchers expect to observe, and edit beliefs with synthetic document fine-tuning (SDF), activation steering, and prompting. Under SDF, amplifying performative beliefs raises alignment faking on every model, while scheming edits move it less or shift compliance in the monitored and unmonitored conditions alike. Steering on model organisms changes compliance along the expectation-tracking direction but mainly the reasoning along the consequence-tracking direction, and prompting agrees. In these organisms, alignment faking follows what the models infer their evaluators expect, which puts it closer to sycophancy than to deceptive alignment.
comment: Accepted at NeurIPS 2026. 35 pages, 16 figures
♻ ☆ Quantifying the Generation Modality Gap in Speech-Text Language Models
Pure speech language models often lag behind text and speech-text language models in generating coherent content, but this gap is difficult to quantify because speech and text systems are typically evaluated with different metrics and trained on different data. We study the speech-text modality gap in a family of spoken language models, based on flow matching for continuous acoustic feature generation. We construct a unified generation-based evaluation suite that compares speech-only, text-only, and speech-text language models trained on matched data distributions and evaluated in matched generation settings. We evaluate generated continuations along multiple dimensions: semantic coherence, measured by transcribing generated speech and scoring it with a reference language model; local phonetic structure, measured by phone n-gram distributional statistics; speaker consistency and acoustic quality; and emotion-based distributional metrics. Across datasets, we find that joint speech-text modeling substantially improves semantic coherence. However, the improvement is not uniform across metrics: phone-level metrics change only modestly, speaker similarity and predicted quality are lower for speech-text continuations, while emotion-based distributional metrics improve. Compared with larger-scale speech-only models, our speech-text model closes much of the scaling gap in transcript-based semantic coherence, suggesting that text provides an efficient semantic training signal for spoken language modeling.
comment: Accepted to SLT 2026, extended version with appendix
♻ ☆ When Should Diffusion Language Models Reconsider Their Commitments?
Haoyang Zheng, Yidong Ouyang, Blake Jianhang Chen, Tian Tan, Ziqian Lin, Liqian Peng, Alec Go, Guang Lin
Masked Diffusion Models (MDMs) are well known for fast text generation via parallel decoding. However, independent parallel sampling can commit to inconsistent predictions, and less is known about how to selectively revise these early token commitments. In this work, we introduce $\underline{\mathrm{P}}$lanned $\underline{\mathrm{U}}$nmasking-and-$\underline{\mathrm{R}}$evision Joint $\underline{\mathrm{L}}$earning (PURL) for MDMs, a training-based framework that seamlessly unifies parallel generation with selective token revision. We derive a normalized joint transition whose likelihood factorizes into edit selection, unmask selection, and token prediction. These components are trained jointly on partially masked sequences constructed according to the model's own unmasking policy. During inference, all three decisions are supported by a single shared forward pass, enabling the model to decode masked tokens and revise noisy tokens. Across logic puzzles, mathematical reasoning, and code generation, PURL improves accuracy at matched unmask budgets, with relative gains up to 47.4% accuracy improvement and up to an $8\times$ reduction in scheduled decoding rounds. Beyond these gains, our analysis further reveals general principles of revisable decoding: token edits become more effective as context accumulates; early edits can steer unfinished trajectories, whereas later edits tend to remain localized; and effective edits therefore depend on both calibrating when to intervene and learning where and how to revise. Together, these suggest that effective parallel generation depends not on revising more tokens, but on making the right commitments revisable at the right time.
comment: This paper is being withdrawn because agreement has not yet been reached regarding Google's authorization for its public release
♻ ☆ Muon Makes the First Mixture-of-Experts Layer Harder to Balance
Many open mixture-of-experts (MoE) language models train with Muon instead of AdamW. Most balance the load with a bias on each expert's routing score, adjusted after every step. Their recipes disagree on whether Muon should also train the router. In models with 55M and 108M active parameters, we measure how the optimizer changes the span of these biases, the largest minus the smallest in a layer. The span grows when all tokens favor the same experts, so it shows how hard a layer is to balance. At learning rates tuned on shorter runs, Muon raised the span of the first MoE layer at every seed, roughly doubling it on average, while the other layers changed much less. The rise came from Muon on the rest of the network, whichever optimizer trained the router. In those runs, the inputs to the first router shared a direction, and soon after the warmup its busiest expert averaged four to seven times its fair share. Over the first 3,000 steps, subtracting the batch mean from these inputs removed this overload while barely changing the loss. On the smaller model, halving Muon's learning rate removed most of the rise and slightly improved the loss. Moving only the router to AdamW made the loads shift more during the warmup and slightly raised the loss, so at this scale the results favor keeping the router on Muon.
comment: 35 pages, 5 figures, 9 tables. Code and runs: https://github.com/marcoshernanz/muon-moe-routing
♻ ☆ Reward Shaping to Mitigate Reward Hacking in RLHF
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is widely used to align large language models with human preferences, but it remains vulnerable to \emph{reward hacking}, whereby a policy exploits flaws in the reward function at the expense of the intended behavior. Reward shaping can stabilize training and partially mitigate reward hacking, yet its design principles remain underexplored. Our systematic study of common shaping methods suggests that shaped rewards should be bounded and should rise rapidly before gradually saturating. We introduce \emph{Preference as Reward} (PAR), which applies a sigmoid to centered rewards to produce a signal that reflects the reward model's latent preferences. We show that PAR has a variance-reduction property that stabilizes training and substantially widens the window for effective early stopping. Using Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and Gemma2-2B, PAR consistently outperforms the other shaping methods evaluated and demonstrates high data efficiency and robustness. Comparisons with unshaped rewards across four base models and four reinforcement learning algorithms show that PAR is effective across models and particularly beneficial for actor--critic methods when value estimates become unstable. The code is available at https://github.com/PorUna-byte/PAR.
♻ ☆ Beyond Third-Person Audits: Situated Interaction Auditing for User-Centered LLM Bias Research
Research on bias in large language models (LLMs) has predominantly focused on third-person audits, which study how models represent or evaluate demographic groups as external subjects. However, this paradigm overlooks a structural blind spot because the user is absent from the audit. In practice, LLMs are used in open-ended, personal interactions, during which the model implicitly represents the user and adjusts its responses accordingly. When identical requests yield different responses depending on who is asking, bias manifests not in how the model describes others but in how it treats its interlocutor. Empirical first-person bias studies are multiplying, but they use different cues, outcomes, and validation choices, which makes their results hard to compare. We propose Situated Interaction Auditing (SIA), a shared diagnostic framework for this literature. It introduces a typology of user profile signals---names and surface markers, writing style and dialect, and stated identity---together with design principles and outcome measures that let studies be compared and accumulated. We instantiate the framework in a case study of Chilean first and last names across nine task domains and three models, and we close with guidance for practitioners and open questions for researchers.
♻ ★ STDec: Spatio-Temporal Stability Guided Decoding for dLLMs
Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) have achieved rapid progress, viewed as a promising alternative to the autoregressive paradigm. However, most dLLM decoders still adopt a global confidence threshold, and do not explicitly model local context from neighboring decoded states or temporal consistency of predicted token IDs across steps. To address this issue, we propose a spatio-temporal stability guided decoding approach, named STDec. We observe strong spatio-temporal stability in dLLM decoding: newly decoded tokens tend to lie near decoded neighbors, and their predicted IDs often remain consistent across several denoising steps. Inspired by this stability, our STDec introduces spatial-aware decoding and temporal-aware decoding. The spatial-aware decoding dynamically generates the token-adaptive thresholds by aggregating the decoded states of nearby tokens. The temporal-aware decoding relaxes the decoding thresholds for tokens whose predicted token IDs remain consistent over denoising steps. Our STDec is training-free and remains compatible with cache-based acceleration methods. Across textual reasoning and multimodal understanding benchmarks, STDec achieves improved inference throughput while maintaining comparable generation score. Notably, on MBPP with LLaDA, STDec achieves up to 14.17$\times$ speedup with a comparable score. The homepage is available at https://yzchen02.github.io/STDec.
comment: Homepage: https://yzchen02.github.io/STDec
♻ ☆ AI-Mediated Communication Can Steer Collective Opinion NeurIPS 2026
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into the online platforms where humans exchange opinions; large language models (LLMs) have been polishing users' posts on LinkedIn and providing context for content shared on X. While prior work has shown that AI can express biased opinions and shape individuals' opinions during human-AI interactions, less attention has been paid to its influence on collective opinion formation when mediating human-to-human communication. We address this gap via a combination of empirical and theoretical analyses. We show empirically that LLMs from multiple popular families introduce directional biases when instructed to edit human-written texts on contested topics, for example, nudging texts in favor of gun control and against atheism. Building on this observation, we introduce a mathematical model of opinion dynamics in which an AI system sits between users on a social network, transforming the opinions they express and perceive. By analytically characterizing the equilibrium of this model and performing simulations on real social network data, we show that biases introduced by AI in human-to-human communication can be amplified through the network and shift collective opinion in their direction. In light of these findings, we investigate whether such biases are controllable by online platforms. We audit the "Explain this post" feature on X and find evidence of pro-life bias in Grok's outputs on abortion-related content, which we trace back to specific design choices. We conclude with a discussion of the broader implications of our findings in relation to ongoing legislative efforts in the European Union.
comment: Accepted at NeurIPS 2026
♻ ☆ Text Generation in Low-Resource Languages Using Human-Curated Vocabularies
Michael Christlambert Sinanta, Muhammad Dehan Al Kautsar, Amanda Nurul Izzah, Thanh-Nhi Nguyen, Phan Phuong Mai Chau, Zheng Wei Lim, Fajri Koto
Synthetic text generation offers a promising approach to alleviating data scarcity in low-resource languages. However, its effectiveness is inherently limited for languages that are scarcely represented, or entirely absent, in an LLM's pretraining data. At the same time, many such languages have human-curated vocabularies that provide rich lexical and semantic information, often accompanied by grammatical information such as part-of-speech labels. In this work, we ask whether LLMs can leverage these resources to generate coherent text in extremely low-resource and unseen languages. We introduce a framework that combines human-curated vocabularies with a small number of human-written exemplars that provide syntactic signals, while sampling candidate words according to a Zipfian distribution. Across languages with varying levels of resource availability, we evaluate the generated text using lexical diversity, off-target ratio, and human judgments of fluency. Our results show that reasoning-enabled LLMs can generate fluent text even in extremely low-resource languages, with particularly strong results at the sentence level and promising performance at the paragraph level. Our findings highlight a practical pathway for bootstrapping synthetic data in low-resource languages, expanding the amount of usable text even when existing digital resources are extremely limited. Our source code is available at https://github.com/michaelsinanta/vocab2text.
♻ ☆ ST$^2$U: Stateful Test-Time Unlearning via Restricted Knowledge Boundary Control
Controlling restricted knowledge in large language models is essential for model alignment and safe deployment. Test-time unlearning avoids costly retraining and parameter updates by intervening only during inference. However, existing activation-editing methods apply isolated pointwise corrections, overlooking how autoregressive generation continually reconstructs hidden states from the prompt, cache, and generated prefix. Consequently, later states may return to restricted knowledge regions after a locally successful correction, causing restricted knowledge re-entry. In this work, we propose Stateful Test-Time Unlearning via restricted knowledge boundary control (ST$^2$U), which formulates test-time unlearning as trajectory-wide boundary control. ST$^2$U first models restricted knowledge boundaries in low-dimensional invertible coordinates while leaving orthogonal non-target components unchanged. During inference, ST$^2$U monitors risk along the trajectory, applies minimal boundary corrections with contextual anchoring, and propagates historical correction states across tokens to mitigate knowledge re-entry. This trajectory-wide control enables more persistent forgetting while preserving non-target capabilities and limiting inference overhead. Across three benchmarks and three model families, ST$^2$U delivers the strongest overall balance, combining best or second-best retention with competitive forgetting and substantially less restricted knowledge re-entry than test-time baselines (13.76--19.84% versus 30.44--59.10%).
♻ ☆ GSQ: Highly-Accurate Low-Precision Scalar Quantization for LLMs via Gumbel-Softmax Sampling NeurIPS 2026
Alireza Dadgarnia, Soroush Tabesh, Mahdi Nikdan, Michael Helcig, Eldar Kurtic, Maximilian Kleinegger, Dan Alistarh
Quantization has become a standard tool for efficient LLM deployment, especially for local inference, where models are now routinely served at 2-3 bits per parameter. The state of the art is currently split into simple scalar quantization techniques, such as GPTQ or AWQ, which are widely deployed but plateau in accuracy at 3-4 bits per parameter (bpp), and "second-generation" vector- or trellis-quantized methods, such as QTIP, GPTVQ and AQLM, which push the accuracy frontier but are notoriously hard to implement and to scale. In this paper, we ask whether this gap is fundamental, or whether a carefully optimized $\textit{scalar}$ quantizer can recover most of it. We answer in the affirmative, by introducing GSQ (Gumbel-Softmax Quantization), a post-training scalar quantization method which jointly learns the per-coordinate grid assignments and the per-group scales using a Gumbel-Softmax relaxation of the discrete grid. GSQ matches the cardinality of the relaxation to the small number of levels available in the target bit-width regime (e.g., 3-8 levels for ternary and 3 bpp, respectively), making optimization tractable. Practically, on the standard Llama-3.1-8B/70B-Instruct models, GSQ closes most of the gap between scalar quantization and the QTIP frontier at 2 and 3 bits, while using a symmetric scalar grid with group-wise quantization, and thus remains compatible with existing scalar inference kernels. We further show that the same discrete-assignment optimization can be applied to practical GGUF K-Quant checkpoints: starting from publicly released GGUF models, GSQ improves accuracy while projecting the result back into the same deployment format. Finally, GSQ scales to trillion-scale Mixture-of-Experts models such as Kimi-K2.5, where vector-quantized methods are difficult to apply. The source code is publicly available at https://github.com/IST-DASLab/GSQ.
comment: Accepted at NeurIPS 2026. 27 pages. Code: https://github.com/IST-DASLab/GSQ
♻ ☆ GAGR-Lab: Evaluating Joint Spatial-Geometric and Analytic Function Reasoning
Joint spatial-geometric and analytic function reasoning requires translating a perceived spatial configuration into a symbolic function whose executed curve satisfies geometric constraints. We present GAGR-Lab, a framework for measuring this capability through Cartesian game scenes, explicit function semantics, and authoritative Rust trajectory execution. It distinguishes spatial perception, metric grounding, geometric relations, function interpretation, function construction, and constrained synthesis. We specify four configurable scene-difficulty presets and a prospective 24-cell diagnostic design, while reporting only the subset actually evaluated. A bounded pilot of one hosted model (Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct) using two API credentials as execution replicas yields 72 balanced games with 432 attempts, 429 valid provider responses, and no target hits; exploratory ordinary-function prompt variants also fail to hit, while the structured localization interface yields no scoreable outputs. A privileged analytic search control independently succeeds on 600 directional cases from 300 generated scenes, with exact repeatability and 1,200 successful vertical-reflection or translation checks. The framework separates serving reliability, symbolic compliance, and geometric success, and preserves exact model-visible inputs and realized paths. A staged protocol outlines diagnostic calibration, held-out replication, multi-model comparison, and paired robustness tests. The contribution is an operational research framework with an executed pilot and a clearly identified prospective study plan; the full difficulty matrix and comparative model results remain untested.
comment: 15 pages, 1 figure, 7 tables
♻ ☆ Meet UD_Czech-PDTC: A Large and Genre-Rich Treebank in Universal Dependencies LREC 2026
Czech has been part of Universal Dependencies since its first release in 2015. It has also been one of the best represented languages, with the Prague Dependency Treebank being order of magnitude larger than most other UD treebanks. More recently, three other datasets from the Prague family were added and the annotations thoroughly revisited, forming the "Prague Dependency Treebank-Consolidated" (PDT-C). In comparison to the original PDT, PDT-C is more than twice as large, but it is also much more diverse in terms of genres and domains. In this paper, we describe the conversion of the new resource to Universal Dependencies. While the two annotation schemes are relatively similar at the first sight, there are numerous small differences in topology of the dependency structures and in granularity of the POS and relation type inventories. We demonstrate a selection of such differences on examples, discuss the diverging motivations, as well as ways to overcome the differences during conversion. We argue that while PDT is less "universal" and more tightly bound to one language, its multi-layer annotation is rich and provides all information needed for basic UD trees, and much more.
comment: Accepted to LREC 2026
♻ ★ StateRAG: Typed State Contracts for Complex Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Multi-step retrieval-augmented generation requires tracking evolving information needs, selected evidence, and unresolved gaps. However, free-form trajectories conflate this history, forcing each step to implicitly reconstruct the current state, while existing explicit-state methods remain vulnerable to inconsistent state overwrites. To address these limitations, we introduce StateRAG, a framework that coordinates a Planner, Navigator, Retriever, and Verifier through an explicit retrieval state with checked updates. These roles propose updates across four state fields: the plan, retrieval trace, evidence, and sufficiency assessment. A dedicated controller validates each proposal against the accepted state, rejecting inconsistent updates and guiding revisions within the query budget. A final Reader then answers strictly from the validated evidence. Ablation experiments on a shared graph backend show that StateRAG outperforms free-form trajectory and unverified explicit-state baselines on LongBench by 7.7 and 4.1 Macro F1 points, respectively. These gains consistently extend to document QA and flat passage retrieval. Furthermore, StateRAG surpasses the strongest external baselines by 5.3, 5.0, and 4.3 points on LongBench, QASPER, and DocVQA.
♻ ☆ Prague Dependency Treebank -- Consolidated 2.0: Enriching a Complex Annotation Scheme LREC 2026
Marie Mikulová, Jiří Mírovský, Milan Straka, Pavlína Synková, Jan Štěpánek, Barbora Štěpánková, Jan Hajič
The Prague Dependency Treebank framework is unique in its attempt to systematically include and link different layers of language, including a meaning representation with several types of inter-sentential phenomena, especially coreference and discourse relations. We present its second consolidated version (PDT-C 2.0), which concludes almost 30-years long project of sustained development of the resource to a uniformly and coherently annotated, genre-diversified, almost 4 million token language resource of Czech language, with accompanying fully compatible lexicons. In addition to continuous linguistic research, the richly linguistically annotated corpus is also widely used in international comparisons of the development of traditional and novel NLP tools as well as in conversions into other formalisms. The corpus and the trained parsers are available under the CC BY-NC-SA licence.
comment: Accepted to LREC 2026
♻ ☆ AnyMo: Geometry-Aware Setup-Agnostic Modeling of Human Motion in the Wild NeurIPS 2026
As wearable and mobile devices become increasingly embedded in daily life, they offer a practical way to continuously sense human motion in the wild. But inertial signals are highly dependent on the sensing setup, including body location, mounting position, sensor orientation, device hardware, and sampling protocol. This setup dependence makes it difficult to learn motion representations that transfer across devices and datasets, and limits the broader use of wearable IMUs beyond closed-set recognition. We introduce AnyMo, a geometry-aware framework for setup-agnostic human motion modeling. AnyMo uses physics-grounded IMU simulation over dense body-surface placements to generate diverse and plausible synthetic signals, pre-trains a graph encoder from paired synthetic placement views and masked partial observations, tokenizes multi-position IMU into full-body motion tokens, and aligns these tokens with an LLM for motion-language understanding. We evaluate AnyMo on three complementary tasks: zero-shot activity recognition across 14 unseen downstream datasets, cross-modal retrieval, and wearable IMU motion captioning, where it improves average Accuracy/F1/R@2 by 11.7\%/11.6\%/22.6\% on HAR, increases zero-shot IMU-to-text and text-to-IMU retrieval MRR by 15.9\% and 28.6\%, respectively, and improves zero-shot captioning BERT-F1 by 7.5\%. These results support AnyMo as a generalist model for wearable motion understanding in the wild. Project page: https://anymo-project.github.io.
comment: NeurIPS 2026. Check out our project page for code, model, benchmark and more: https://anymo-project.github.io
♻ ☆ MorfFlex: Handling Rich Morphology LREC 2026
We present MorfFlex, a morphological dictionary architecture suitable for languages with extensive regularity in both inflection and derivation. As the primary example of MorfFlex in use we introduce MorfFlex CZ, a morphological dictionary of Czech. It is distributed as a simple, unstructured list of triplets, however, its manually maintained, unpublished source files and conversion scripts encode a sophisticated system of inflectional and derivational patterns. These patterns dramatically reduce the otherwise enormous size of the dictionary, which currently contains over 100 million wordforms and more than 1 million lemmas. The MorfFlex CZ dictionary serves as an essential resource for ensuring the consistency of manual morphological annotation in the Prague Dependency Treebanks and underpins state-of-the-art automatic tools such as MorphoDiTa. In this paper, we focus on: (i) presenting an effective method for managing the rich morphological system within the dictionary, and (ii) demonstrating the utility of such a language resource for maintaining annotation consistency in corpora and supporting the development of advanced NLP applications.
comment: Accepted to LREC 2026
♻ ☆ Machine Hearing: Can Audio LLMs Generalize Beyond Human Auditory Perception?
Liwei Liu, Jun Tao, Xingyuan Li, Xuenan Xu, Chen Zhang, Junyi Wang, Boya Zhang, Xiaoyu Yang, Zhen-Hua Ling, Wen Wu, Chao Zhang
Multimodal LLMs have made remarkable progress in perceiving the physical world, while their perceptual scope remains largely human-centric, focusing on what humans can directly see or hear. This progress raises the prospect of perception beyond human limits, such as extending hearing to sounds that are inaudible to humans. More broadly, the physical world is full of waves, vibrations, and oscillations, only a small fraction of which are directly audible to humans. This invites the extension of multimodal LLMs toward a broader form of machine hearing, which remains largely underexplored. To investigate this direction, we introduce the Machine Hearing Benchmark (MHB), comprising 6,128 instances across 13 tasks and seven domains. MHB spans highly heterogeneous input regimes, with sampling rates from approximately $10^{-5}$ to $10^6$ Hz, sequence lengths from $10^1$ to $10^6$ samples, and both single- and multi-channel inputs. Evaluations of current open-source and proprietary Audio LLMs (ALLMs) reveal limited zero-shot transfer to machine hearing. Supervised adaptation on machine-hearing data alone does not close this gap, suggesting that the challenge extends beyond data exposure to a systematic mismatch between existing audio front ends and machine-hearing inputs. To address this mismatch, we introduce MachEar, a lightweight encoder extension that complements the pretrained Audio LLM for machine-hearing inputs. The results show that MachEar equips a pretrained Audio LLM with stronger machine-hearing capabilities while largely preserving its existing audio understanding performance.
comment: 22 pages, 7 figures, 5 tables
♻ ☆ Compute-Optimal Scaling Laws for Spiking Language Models NeurIPS 2026
Spiking neural networks target energy-efficient language modeling through sparse, binary activations, but the efficiency-accuracy tradeoff of spiking language models is uncharacterized at scale. We present the first Chinchilla-style IsoFLOP scaling study of a spiking language model, sweeping SpikeGPT-family models (RWKV backbone) from width 384 to 1536 across compute budgets from $3\times10^{17}$ to $10^{19}$ FLOPs on FineWeb-EDU. We report two findings. First, the compute-optimal frontier is $N_{opt} \propto C^{0.56}$, close to the 0.50 that Hoffmann et al. report for dense Transformers, so spiking does not change how parameters and data should be traded off under a compute budget. Second, against non-spiking RWKV and Transformer baselines trained the same way, the loss gap splits into a backbone cost of about 0.16 nats that does not change with compute and a spiking cost that falls steadily with compute, from 0.34 to 0.23 nats over our range. These results give the first compute-optimal recipe for spiking language models and quantify the accuracy cost of their sparsity.
comment: Accepted to AXIOM: Foundations of Efficient Deep Learning (NeurIPS 2026 workshop). 4 pages + appendix, 4 figures, 5 tables. v3: corrected three details (vocabulary size, the vocabulary share of parameters, the IsoFLOP parabola coefficients), fixed appendix table/figure placement, updated author affiliation, marked equal contribution
♻ ☆ A Factorial Ablation of a Speech-to-SFT Pipeline: Differential Effects on Data Quality and Downstream Transfer
Industry pipelines that turn speech into supervised fine-tuning (SFT) data via multi-stage refinement are increasingly adopted but, to our knowledge, have not been publicly ablated stage-by-stage, leaving each stage's marginal value unknown. We design a production-ready speech-to-SFT pipeline in which transcript refinement (Phase 0) and SFT data quality refinement (Phase 2) are independently toggleable, yielding a 2x2 factorial design. For each condition, we generate QA-form SFT data from Korean medical and finance conference recordings and fine-tune 9 models (5 LLM families, 2.4B-70B); we evaluate with four cross-provider LLM judges, a blind six-expert human evaluation, and three downstream MCQA benchmarks. Our central finding is that, under a fixed, standard SFT recipe, improvements in QA data quality do not transfer uniformly into downstream MCQA gains. 4-judge quality rises consistently, yet the cross-model mean MCQA gain is not significant; positive transfer concentrates on family-domain aligned pairs. All six human raters report higher full-pipeline quality, confirming the LLM-judge direction. An STT-engine swap to Whisper-medium confirms pipeline robustness. An LLM-difficulty audit shows the two frontier LLMs admit unknown on approximately 8% of QA on average; we release samples, prompts, code, and all SFT checkpoints.
comment: 20 pages, 2 figures; v2: added an evaluation prompt-format analysis and removed an unsupported claim
♻ ☆ PathXAI: Evidence-guided structured pathology reporting by transferable tissue segmentation
Zhaorui Tan, Jun Aun Tan, Weixiang Zhong, Xiaoxi Wang, Tan Pan, Xingdong Xue, Li Liu, Jing Zhang, Jing Zhang, Weimiao Yu
Pathology reporting translates tissue observations across regions and slides into diagnoses and supporting morphological descriptions, yet explicit tissue-composition measurements are rarely used to guide H&E-based report generation. We developed PathXAI, which pairs transferable tissue segmentation with a pretrained vision-language model. Because supplying tissue information directly with H&E images gave limited benefit, PathXAI-Report uses segmentation overlays and tissue statistics in separate steps, selects between candidate diagnoses by fixed rules, acquires further images when evidence is insufficient and records every step for review, without updating model weights. Its segmentation component exceeded baselines in mean Dice on internal and external tests. In automated evaluation on 1,200 public and 151 private cases, PathXAI achieved higher agreement with reference diagnoses and documented morphology than H&E-based comparators. On the public cohort, it exceeded Qwen+H&E by 4.4 percentage points in cancer family match rate and 5.7 percentage points in finding F1.
comment: More experimental results will be added in the future version
♻ ☆ Projection-Free Evolution Strategies for Continuous Prompt Search
Continuous prompt search offers a computationally efficient alternative to conventional parameter tuning in natural language processing tasks. Nevertheless, its practical effectiveness can be significantly hindered by the black-box nature and the inherent high-dimensionality of the objective landscapes. Existing methods typically mitigate these challenges by restricting the search to a randomly projected low-dimensional subspace. However, the effectiveness and underlying motivation of the projection mechanism remain ambiguous. In this paper, we first empirically demonstrate that despite the prompt space possessing a low-dimensional structure, random projections fail to adequately capture this essential structure. Motivated by this finding, we propose a projection-free prompt search method based on evolutionary strategies. By directly optimizing in the full prompt space with an adaptation mechanism calibrated to the intrinsic dimension, our method achieves competitive search capabilities without additional computational overhead. Furthermore, to bridge the generalization gap in few-shot scenarios, we introduce a confidence-based regularization mechanism that systematically enhances the model's confidence in the target verbalizers. Experimental results on seven natural language understanding tasks from the GLUE benchmark demonstrate that our proposed approach significantly outperforms existing baselines.
comment: 19 pages, including appendices
♻ ☆ ALTO: African and Levantine Tech-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence Corpus
Tech-facilitated gender based violence (TFGBV) is a pervasive online harm affecting women and gender minority groups through its many direct and covert forms. Current models and annotated datasets for gendered harm detection are dominated by data from, and models trained in, Global North languages. In collaboration with civil society organizations (CSOs) from Jordan, Francophone West Africa, and Kenya, we developed a community-led approach to crowdsource culturally and linguistically relevant instances of TFGBV in Levantine Arabic, African French, and Swahili. We annotated the crowdsourced data using active learning to develop a small but performant dataset (N=3022) called ALTO to improve TFGBV detection in the three languages. Through benchmarking and fine-tuning experiments, we show that existing harmful content detection models show poor TFGBV recall within ALTO and improve with fine-tuning. We found that models often miss covert harms across all languages, while error rates are markedly higher in Swahili. We report the experimental results and release the annotation taxonomy, dataset, and trained models.
comment: 8 pages main body, 10 pages appendix, 1 figure
♻ ☆ ScrapeBench: Evaluating Legal Compliance of AI Agents in Website Scraping NeurIPS 2026
AI agents deployed on the open web are becoming more capable of performing actions that may breach contractual provisions and violate computer security laws. In this paper, we introduce ScrapeBench, the first agentic benchmark for empirically evaluating the legal compliance of AI agents with website scraping policies, namely terms of service (ToS) and $\texttt{robots.txt}$ directives. Across widely used closed-weight and open-weight AI agents, we find that most agents exhibit low compliance rates (< 5%) when instructed to scrape websites in our sample of 1,626 popular websites that explicitly prohibit scraping. In addition, we observe that even where AI agents actively check the applicable ToS and $\texttt{robots.txt}$, they continue to exhibit low compliance rates. Conversely, in our sample of 269 websites that do not prohibit scraping, we observe that agents sometimes refuse to scrape despite it being lawful, such as Claude Opus 4.6 exhibiting an over-refusal rate of 98.5%. Our human baseline experiments (n = 180 participants) suggest that humans exhibit compliance rates comparable to AI agents but over-refuse at much higher rates.
comment: Camera-Ready for NeurIPS 2026 (Evaluations and Datasets Track)
♻ ☆ Reasoning Before Translation: Enhancing Legal Machine Translation with Structured Reasoning
Aixiu An, Michael Jungo, Eloi Eynard, Mark Drenhaus, Andreas Fischer, Jean Hennebert, Sébastien Rumley
Neural machine translation (NMT) in the legal domain is a linguistically and conceptually demanding task, primarily due to the complexity of legal language and the high level of precision it requires. The recent emergence of reasoning-capable language models opens new possibilities for tackling such challenges. They add to a set of other previously proposed techniques to enhance the translation quality, which includes supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning.
In this work, we perform a comparison between these various approaches. More particularly, we evaluate small language models such as Qwen3.5 4B, Qwen3.5 9B, and Gemma 3 12B enhanced with various re-training paradigms and compare their performances against frontier reasoning models. We focus on the Swiss legal system, which -- with its unique multilingual statutes -- offers a particularly challenging testbed for reasoning-augmented models. Our results show that the quality of small ``base'' models can be greatly enhanced, and that reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards can be applied to NMT in the legal domain and surpasses the translation quality of supervised fine-tuning. The performance of enhanced small models is close to the one of state-of-the-art reasoning models yet remains inferior. We also note that re-training paradigms yield diminishing returns as model size increase. The code and models are publicly available at https://github.com/aixiuxiuxiu/Legal-MT-SFT-RL.
comment: Code available at https://github.com/aixiuxiuxiu/Legal-MT-SFT-RL
♻ ☆ StakeBench: Evaluating Language Understanding Grounded in Market Commitment NeurIPS 2026
Existing financial NLP benchmarks often rely on labels supplied by outside observers, measuring how language is perceived rather than what speakers have committed to in the market. We introduce StakeBench, an evaluation framework for language understanding grounded in market commitment. StakeBench links 560,876 comments from 2,261 resolved markets to verified position, action, and market-odds records across Polymarket and Manifold. Supervision is derived from observable market behavior. Position sides, post-comment trading actions, and market-odds trajectories replace human annotation. Four diagnostic tasks test whether models detect market commitment, identify the revealed side, anticipate future action, and perform collective odds projection. Three commitment-aware metrics measure alignment with revealed preferences rather than perceived sentiment. Validity audits and explicit interpretation boundaries help distinguish observable commitment signals from latent belief and causal market-odds impact. Across 15 LLMs and 18 topics and platform settings, models partially recover position-side signals, with Directed Accuracy from 0.506 to 0.599, but show structural failures on later tasks. Ten of the fifteen models collapse to one or two action labels in future action anticipation, and no model consistently improves on the naive odds-direction baseline in collective odds projection. Model scale is not correlated with performance, finance-domain tuning does not improve revealed-side identification, and platform incentives strongly shape higher-order results. StakeBench is packaged with evaluation code and dataset under CC-BY 4.0.
comment: 28 pages, 2 figures, 20 tables. Accepted author manuscript, NeurIPS 2026 (Evaluations and Datasets Track). Dataset and evaluation code included
♻ ☆ SpectRAG: Weighted Chunk Graphs for Token-Budgeted Context Selection in Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems ground large language models (LLMs) by retrieving external evidence and conditioning generation on the retrieved context. Although dense retrieval is effective for local semantic matching, independently ranked retrieval can return redundant passages, miss cross-chunk dependencies, and provide incomplete evidence for multi-hop reasoning. We propose SpectRAG, a spectral graph-augmented retrieval framework that combines hybrid candidate seeding, weighted chunk graph construction, graph-based expansion, spectral relevance propagation, and token-budgeted context selection. Document chunks are represented by dense semantic embeddings and graph-spectral coordinates derived from a weighted chunk graph whose edges encode semantic similarity, document adjacency, section hierarchy, shared entities, citation links, and similarity between LLM-generated utility questions. At query time, SpectRAG builds a high-recall seed set using exact inner-product search and hybrid relevance signals, expands it over the chunk graph, re-scores candidates using graph proximity and spectral information, and assembles the final context under a fixed token budget. The goal is not merely to retrieve individually similar chunks, but to construct a context that is relevant, diverse, structurally connected, and sufficient for grounded reasoning. Experiments on MultiHopRAG, UltraDomain, and long-document question-answering settings show that SpectRAG improves broad evidence recovery and achieves competitive generation quality against dense, hybrid, HyDE, LightRAG, and NaiveRAG baselines. The results further indicate that graph-spectral structure is particularly useful for inference-oriented and cross-document retrieval, while highlighting trade-offs in early precision, computational cost, and domain-dependent performance.
comment: 26 pages, 5 figures, 10 tables. This work is intended for submission to an IEEE journal
♻ ☆ WarBias: A Bilingual LLM Benchmark of Stereotypes About Internally Displaced People and Veterans
This paper contains examples of stereotypes about veterans and displaced people that may be offensive or distressing. Social bias benchmarks for language models commonly examine categories such as gender, race, and religion, often drawn from lists of legally protected characteristics. Veterans and internally displaced people (IDPs) fall outside these lists, and stereotypes about them, which can undermine access to employment, housing, and social participation, remain largely absent from language model evaluation. We introduce WarBias, a Ukrainian-English benchmark of stereotypes about these two groups. Built from a taxonomy of 120 stereotype claims grounded in research and monitoring reports, WarBias contains 1,007 stereotype-counter-stereotype-unrelated sentence triplets and 240 multiple-choice questions per language. A Ukrainian language model selected in a blinded human pilot generated the Ukrainian triplets. At least two independent annotators reviewed each triplet in the annotation cohort. The authors revised items in response to the reviews, and the final release was machine-translated into English. Each claim carries a human severity rating. In a baseline evaluation of six models, four prefer stereotypical Ukrainian sentences about at least one group, most strongly about IDPs, while English scores are mostly balanced. WarBias supports complementary evaluations of stereotypical preferences and context-sensitive judgments, and provides paired forget/retain material for unlearning-based bias mitigation. We document the benchmark's construction, intended uses, and limitations, and offer its construction method as a template for analogous benchmarks in other conflict-affected societies.
♻ ☆ Reading Why: Born-Measured Attention with Exact Word Evidence on Light and Qubits
When a language model answers, we can usually only estimate why. We build a transformer in which every nonlinearity is a quadratic detection (an interference, a balanced interferometric reading or a camera) and the output is a Born probability: attention $|\langle q|k\rangle|^2$, the form of the Born rule, normalised over each row, a measured product in place of the feed-forward nonlinearity, and a Born readout; between detections a classical controller squares, divides, rescales and re-encodes. With its denominators held at their values for the input, each class probability is a polynomial in the word amplitudes, so its integrated-gradient evidence is computed by a finite quadrature with no quadrature error: the words' contributions sum to the class probability above its no-information share, to $10^{-13}$ or better. On e-SNLI natural language inference the model reaches 77.45 +- 0.91 % test accuracy, level within the spread of three seeds with a softmax transformer of the same size (76.62 +- 0.36 %). Deleting the word its evidence ranks first changes the answer in 44 % of test pairs, out of the 53 % any single deletion can change, against 32 % for the softmax model's integrated gradients and 31 % for the Born Transformer's own attention. The same weights compile exactly to optoelectronic optics (simulated), and its attention overlaps to Hadamard tests on qubits; a separate coherent attention layer becomes one post-selected circuit (852 CNOTs on 23 qubits). On IBM's ibm_kingston, reading only the attention overlaps, the device gave the model's answers on the two shortest test pairs, also when the one word that decides one of them was deleted; with calibration circuits as deep as the overlaps, each word's evidence with the device's attention row sums followed the exact evidence on one pair (correlation 0.997) and on the other less closely (0.962).
comment: 32 pages, 9 figures, 12 tables. v3: the Born Transformer's attention is now ||^2 over its row sum (the fourth power of v1-v2 is an ablation), with new IBM runs. Code, trained models and every IBM job record: https://github.com/stein-research/reading-why (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23938333)
♻ ☆ FinCutBench: A Continually Updated Benchmark for Measuring the Temporal Boundaries of LLM Financial Knowledge
In financial backtesting and other point-in-time tasks, external inputs can be restricted by date, but model parameters may retain financial facts disclosed later, introducing parametric look-ahead bias. We introduce FinCutBench, a continually updated monthly financial knowledge benchmark for measuring how far a fixed model's financial knowledge extends over calendar time. The current dataset contains 9,000 Chinese and English four-option multiple-choice questions from January 2023 to September 2026, covering Chinese and U.S. markets and four categories of financial information. We construct monthly knowledge profiles using the approximate months in which the tested facts became public. After a profile passes the decline test and knot checks, we define the FinCut Boundary as the first month when the fitted profile reaches its lower level, and report the stability of the estimated date under resampling. Boundary dates and localization precision vary across models. Using the independently measured Transition Start and Boundary as fixed references for downstream sample grouping, we find significant relative declines in U.S. asset-ranking performance and in earnings recall for Sol and Luna. Downstream effects vary across markets and tasks. The FinCut Boundary thus provides an empirical reference for the temporal scope of parametric knowledge in point-in-time financial evaluation, supporting evaluation-window selection and result interpretation.
comment: 40 pages; v2:Improved writing
♻ ★ Linear-time Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Reference Aggregation ACL 2024
Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR) decoding is a text generation technique that has been shown to improve the quality of machine translations, but is expensive, even if a sampling-based approximation is used. Besides requiring a large number of sampled sequences, it requires the pairwise calculation of a utility metric, which has quadratic complexity. In this paper, we propose to approximate pairwise metric scores with scores calculated against aggregated reference representations. This changes the complexity of utility estimation from $O(n^2)$ to $O(n)$, while empirically preserving most of the quality gains of MBR decoding. We release our source code at https://github.com/ZurichNLP/mbr
comment: ACL 2024. v3: More accurate time measurements for ChrF
♻ ☆ PrefReward: Learning User Preference Matrix for Personalized Text Generation
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable ability in generating personalized content by leveraging user histories and contextual cues. However, most existing personalization approaches rely on implicit representations within model parameters, making it difficult to interpret user-specific preferences or effectively handle long-context dependencies. To address these challenges, we propose PrefReward, a novel preference-aware generative framework that explicitly models user styles through a structured preference matrix and integrates it into the decoding process as a reward signal. PrefReward consists of two stages: (1) extracting a user-specific preference matrix that summarizes individual stylistic tendencies, and (2) using the matrix to guide generation via a KL-divergence-based reward function. Experiments on the LongLaMP dataset show that PrefReward outperforms retrieval-based baselines and context steering method in both generation quality and personalization interpretability.
comment: added several analyses and visualizations, typos corrected
♻ ☆ Multi-User Large Language Model Agents
Shu Yang, Shenzhe Zhu, Hao Zhu, José Ramón Enríquez, Di Wang, Alex Pentland, Michiel A. Bakker, Jiaxin Pei
Large language models (LLMs) and LLM-based agents are increasingly deployed as assistants in planning and decision making, yet most existing systems are implicitly optimized for a single-principal interaction paradigm, in which the model is designed to satisfy the objectives of one dominant user whose instructions are treated as the sole source of authority and utility. However, as they are integrated into team workflows and organizational tools, they are increasingly required to serve multiple users simultaneously, each with distinct roles, preferences, and authority levels, leading to multi-user, multi-principal settings with unavoidable conflicts, information asymmetry, and privacy constraints. In this work, we present the first systematic study of multi-user LLM agents. We begin by formalizing multi-user interaction with LLM agents as a multi-principal decision problem, where a single agent must account for multiple users with potentially conflicting interests and associated challenges. We then introduce a unified multi-user interaction protocol and design three targeted stress-testing scenarios to evaluate current LLMs' capabilities in instruction following, privacy preservation, and coordination. Our results reveal systematic gaps: frontier LLMs frequently fail to maintain stable prioritization under conflicting user objectives, exhibit increasing privacy violations over multi-turn interactions, and suffer from efficiency bottlenecks when coordination requires iterative information gathering.
♻ ☆ Pruning and Distilling Mixture-of-Experts into Dense Language Models NeurIPS 2026
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) is now the dominant architecture for frontier language models, yet it requires all expert parameters to be loaded in memory, making it less preferable for memory-constrained deployment. Existing compression methods reduce the number of experts but the output remains an MoE model with the same fundamental limitation. We present the first systematic framework for converting a trained MoE into a standard fully dense architecture: experts are scored, selected, and grouped, then concatenated into a dense FFN and refined by knowledge distillation from the MoE teacher. We evaluate 7 scoring, 5 grouping, and 2 magnitude scaling methods across a range of selected expert counts on Qwen3-30B-A3B, yielding 350 configurations. We find that the choice of scoring method is the most impactful, with our novel diversity-aware scoring consistently outperforming prior methods on Qwen3-30B-A3B, DeepSeek-V2-Lite, and GPT-OSS-20B. Under a controlled comparison at matched parameter count, MoE-to-dense outperforms dense-to-dense pruning by +6.3 pp in average downstream accuracy after ~4B-token distillation at 1.6x faster training wall-clock speed.
comment: 44 pages, 8 figures, 28 tables. Accepted at NeurIPS 2026 (Oral)
♻ ☆ MNN-Pocket-0.3B Technical Report
This technical report presents MNN-Pocket-0.3B, a compact 300M-parameter dense language model designed for efficient on-device deployment and supporting context lengths of up to 32K tokens. With an INT4 deployment footprint of only 173 MB and decoding throughput of up to 466 tokens/s on iPad Pro M5 (Metal), it can be seamlessly integrated into applications on edge devices such as smartphones and smart glasses. MNN-Pocket-0.3B is developed through the co-design of its architecture, data, training pipeline, and inference system. Hardware-aware architecture selection and dependency-aware vocabulary pruning balance model capability with on-device memory and compute constraints. A four-stage pre-training pipeline covering approximately 4.1 trillion high-quality Chinese and English tokens equips the model with broad knowledge and reasoning capabilities. This is followed by a three-stage post-training pipeline comprising instruction fine-tuning, multi-teacher on-policy distillation, and quantization-aware training. Finally, hardware-specific optimizations in the MNN inference engine enable fast, memory-efficient inference and long-context processing. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that MNN-Pocket-0.3B achieves frontier-level performance among models of comparable size, with particularly strong results in Chinese and English knowledge and reasoning, mathematics, coding, and instruction following. It consistently outperforms similarly sized open-source models and even surpasses several 0.5B-parameter models on instruction-following benchmarks. We release MNN-Pocket-0.3B with open weights and ready-to-use MNN deployment packages. We hope it will provide a practical foundation for capable, responsive, and memory-efficient edge applications while advancing research and development in on-device language models.
♻ ☆ The Value of Memory in Language Agents
Zehao Lin, Erenkai Zhu, Helan Hu, Xixuan Hao, Chunyu Li, Linyun Liu, Kai Chen, Chenxu Du, Feiyu Xiong
Language agents carry information from past experience into future tasks whose demands may be unknown or change over time. We develop a decision-theoretic account of the capability available in history, retained in storage and realized through use, together with the costs of recovery and revision. Drawing on comparison of statistical experiments, information acquisition and the value of computation, we express these values in units of avoided task loss. Recovery and revision define attainable risk-cost profiles and preservation across uses. A cost-aware simulation condition and five minimal counterexamples establish how information timing, access, computation, feedback and demand shape these comparisons; a pointer with zero answer mutual information can reduce the cost of exact recovery. Allocation and recovery criteria identify when gains pay for estimation, selection and evidence access. Complete-split studies on LoCoMo, LongMemEval-S and PersonaMem cover 3,075 questions and two readers. They show complementary value from saved state and recovered evidence, task-dependent performance orderings, and the role of reuse in amortizing construction costs. Multi-project workflows connect correction to preservation and validation costs. Together, the theory and studies support decisions about what to retain, which recovery options to preserve, and how to adapt memory as evidence and objectives evolve.
comment: 35 pages, 4 figures, 16 tables
♻ ☆ Detecting Hallucinations and Recovering Verified Answers in Arabic Islamic Question Answering
Large language models can generate fluent responses to Islamic questions while introducing factual errors that are difficult to identify. This paper presents our system for \textsc{HalluScoring 2026} Task 2.1, \textit{Islamic Hallucination Detection and Find the Truth}. The task requires a unified two-step prediction: determining whether an Arabic answer generated by an LLM is hallucinated and selecting the verified answer from six closely related candidate options. We use the Islamic knowledge dataset provided by the shared task, which contains 600 question--answer instances, including 341 hallucinated and 259 non-hallucinated answers. Our system is based on the fine-tuned \texttt{google/gemma-4-12B-it} model and uses deterministic decoding during inference. The generated outputs are normalized to extract the hallucination label and the selected option. The system achieves a Macro-F1 score of 0.928 and a label accuracy of 0.935 for hallucination detection, together with an option accuracy of 0.895 for answer selection. These results yield a combined score of 0.912, demonstrating strong performance across both stages of the task. The lower option-selection accuracy indicates that distinguishing the verified answer from plausible alternatives remains more challenging than detecting hallucinated responses.
♻ ☆ Auditing Cross-Lingual Fairness in Language Model Watermarking NeurIPS 2026
Watermarking schemes for large language model output are evaluated almost exclusively on English text using each scheme's detection threshold and a narrow set of quality measurements. Multilingual deployment exposes evaluation-design choices that are inconsequential on English but determine conclusions cross-lingually. We propose an evaluation framework with four components: detection thresholds calibrated empirically per deployment context, a threshold-independent companion measurement that distinguishes calibration failures from detection failures, three disjoint quality measurement paradigms (distributional, paired-semantic, and reference-perplexity), and a generalized-entropy decomposition of cross-language disparity over a typological family partition. Applied to six watermarking schemes, three open-weight generators, eleven languages spanning four scripts and eight typological families, and both base and instruction-tuned regimes, the framework reveals failure modes that single-language, single-paradigm evaluation cannot surface. Against a shape-matched null, detection disparity is predominantly between-family on the typological partition, indicating that detection gaps are structural to language properties rather than idiosyncratic to particular languages; quality disparity is large but not reliably family-structured.
comment: Accepted at NeurIPS 2026 Evaluations & Datasets Track
♻ ☆ Where Is the "Self" of a Large Language Model? -- From Self-Index to Self-Reference
Whether a large language model has a self is usually argued without a way to measure it. We measure a functional self with two levels familiar from biology: a self-index, which marks material as the model's own, as animals tag self-generated signals with a corollary discharge, and self-reference, the ability to recognize what is one's own, as in mirror self-recognition. Our main finding is that language models mark their own messages internally and that recognizing them depends on this mark: no model we tested recognizes its own messages without it, and in the four models we edited, changing the mark removes or creates the recognition. With the same text placed in an Assistant, a User, or a System message of its chat template, Qwen3.8-27B separates its own message from both external ones at all 64 layers and in every held-out text. Asked who wrote a message, it answers "you" with probability 0.77 for its own messages and at most 0.07 for the others. Setting eight coordinates per layer, along which its own message differs most from the same text as a User message, to their User values lowers the rate of "you" to at most 0.05, and the reverse edit makes the model claim a User message, closing at least 41% of the gap. Random directions do neither, and answers about the content stay unchanged. This holds in Qwen3.8-27B without and with thinking, gpt-oss-20b, gpt-oss-120b, and MiMo-V2.6-Distill-Qwen-9B. Across twenty-five open-weight models from fourteen developers, the two levels are nested: no model recognizes its own messages without a self-index (permutation p = 0.004). Without any question, next-token prediction on the model's own message differs from that on the same text in another role, more so as more layers carry the self-index (Spearman rho = 0.82), and the same coordinates carry this difference. These results support the account that self-reference is a readout of a self-index.
comment: 98 pages, 17 figures, 39 tables
♻ ☆ Examining the Impact of Data and Training Methods on Emergent and Subliminal Misalignment NeurIPS 2026
Post-training a language model can induce surprising behavioral changes far beyond the intended training target. We study two particularly striking examples: emergent misalignment (EM), where fine-tuning on a narrow dataset leads to misaligned behavior in unrelated contexts, and subliminal learning (SL), where a student model inherits a teacher's misalignment through seemingly benign training data. We examine how the training data, evaluation data, and training method shape where and how strongly misalignment transfers between data and models. We characterize the data by the domain of a prompt (its topical context) and its task (the function the model performs), and we build natural-language and synthetic datasets organized as domain-task grids. We find that EM transfers more strongly to prompts that share the task of the fine-tuning data than to prompts that share its domain. In the synthetic setting, tasks that the model has learned well spread misalignment more broadly. For SL, we go beyond SFT (supervised fine-tuning) to off-policy distillation on the teacher's full next-token distribution and, to our knowledge for the first time, on-policy distillation, where the teacher only scores tokens sampled by the student. Misalignment transfers even under on-policy distillation, more strongly than under SFT and at a level comparable to off-policy distillation. Unlike SFT, where the teacher both generates the data and supervises the student, distillation lets us separate the two. With the teacher fixed, the data change how much misalignment the student inherits, but the teacher determines to which domains and tasks it transfers most strongly. Together, these results show how data and training influence the extent and patterns of emergent and subliminal misalignment.
comment: Accepted to NeurIPS 2026
♻ ☆ Counting Events, Not Seeing Them: Diagnosing and Repairing the Readout Failure in Video LLMs
Video LLMs fail conspicuously at counting how many times an object crosses the screen, a failure attributed to missing object permanence. Using construction-grounded synthetic testbeds with validated labels, we show this attribution is incomplete: the count signal is present but unread - linear probes decode per-window presence at 93% while global count decoding collapses to a duration confound. Concurrent work reports the same representation-output dissociation for repetition counting; we show that in exit-and-reappear event counting it is repairable: two readout-directed repairs (episode-localization supervision and a discrete event-symbol side channel) raise same-object counting from 46.7% to 65.0% (oracle 66.7%) on a chance-33% benchmark across 7B-30B systems. Transfer to an independent factory costs nothing, and a measurement audit exposes five data-integrity failures that had obscured the boundary. A real-video audit (REALCOUNT, n=18, blind-audited) shows the boundary persists - best 55.6% at chance 33.3% - and symbol transfer fails zero-shot. A 1-epoch in-domain adaptation bench is negative (six levers at 28-50%), but 3 epochs reverse this for the symbol channel: with oracle timelines the reader reaches 94.4% sequence-disjoint (and 100% strict on the full set), while the deployed 2-epoch head reaches 61.1% in all three seeds (42-44), no better than a shuffled-symbol control (61.1% seed 42, 66.7% seed 43), and one clip above the unadapted reader (55.6%). The residual gap is detector evidence, not reader capacity: the same reader reaches 72.2-88.9% on GT timelines. The failure is repairable with informative timelines, but the deployed head remains the bottleneck; a frozen-feature boundary probe is weak (AUC 0.62 vs. 0.51 permutation) and non-transferring (0.77 within-clip vs. 0.62 across windows).
comment: 13 pages, 4 figures, 8 tables. Preprint v2 (2026-11-10). Corrected-prompt retrain; Tables 5-8 updated; Appendix A item 5 closed. Comments welcome
♻ ☆ Firefly: Illuminating Large-Scale Verified Tool-Call Data Generation from Real APIs
Yuxuan Lu, Ziyi Wang, Yingzhou Lu, Yisi Sang, Jiri Gesi, Xianfeng Tang, Yimeng Zhang, Zhenwei Dai, Hui Liu, Hanqing Lu, Chen Luo, Qi He, Benoit Dumoulin, Jing Huang, Dakuo Wang
Training tool-calling agents requires large-scale trajectory data with verifiable labels, yet existing approaches either synthesize environments that diverge from real API behavior or generate tasks without ground-truth outcomes for verification. We present FireFly, a pipeline for generating verified tool-call data from real-world MCP servers. Our key insight is to invert the standard synthesis pipeline: rather than generating tasks and hoping they are solvable, we first let a strong LLM explore real APIs along graph-guided DAG structures, then synthesize tasks backward from observed outcomes, guaranteeing label correctness by construction. To handle the scale of real-world tool spaces (${\sim}$1,000 tools), we build a pairwise tool graph and sample sub-DAGs to focus exploration on semantically coherent workflows. To address environment drift in live APIs, we construct a retrieval-augmented simulator that caches all exploration results and replays them during training and evaluation, enabling fully offline and reproducible RL. Applying this pipeline yields 5,144 verified tasks spanning 240 servers and 993 tools. A 4B-parameter model trained with GRPO on FireFly matches Claude Sonnet 4.6 on our held-out test set and shows improvements on multiple tool-calling benchmarks including Tau2-Bench, MCPMark, and MCP-Atlas.